CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,533

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines

Allendorf, Fred W., Leary, Robb F., Spruell, Paul, Wenburg, John K.·2001·Trends in Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Management of hybrid populations is a controversial topic, and anthropogenic activities will likely continue to increase incidence and prevalence of animal hybridization.

    “Management of hybrid populations is a controversial topic (Allendorf et al. 2001; Detwiler et al. 2005), and anthropogenic activities will likely continue to increase incidence and prevalence of animal hybridization.”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Allendorf et al. 2001

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Stone, 2000, Phylogeography, hybridization and speciation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 354, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01947-9 · DOI
  2. Rhymer, 1996, Extinction by hybridization and introgression, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 83, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83 · DOI
  3. Dowling, 1997, The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 593, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593 · DOI
  4. Grant, 1992, Hybridization of bird species, Science, 256, 193, 10.1126/science.256.5054.193 · DOI
  5. Leary, 1995, Hybridization and introgression between introduced and native fish, Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 15, 91
  6. Smith, 1992, Introgression in fishes – significance for paleontology, cladistics, and evolutionary rates, Syst. Biol., 41, 41, 10.1093/sysbio/41.1.41 · DOI
  7. Ferguson, 1985, Absence of developmental incompatibility in hybrids between rainbow trout and two subspecies of cutthroat trout, Biochem, Genet., 23, 557
  8. Jiggins, 2000, Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation., Trends Ecol, Evol., 15, 250
  9. Leary, 1996, Success of basibranchial teeth in indicating pure populations of rainbow trout and failure to indicate pure populations of westslope cutthroat trout, N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 16, 210, 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0210:SOBTII>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  10. Ayala, 1972, Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 69, 1094, 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1094 · DOI
  11. Taberlet, 1999, Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 323, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01637-7 · DOI
  12. O'Brien, 1991, Bureaucratic mischief: recognizing endangered species and subspecies, Science, 251, 1187, 10.1126/science.251.4998.1187 · DOI
  13. Johnson, O.W. et al. (1999) Status review of coastal cutthroat trout from Washington, Oregon, and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-37
  14. Dawley, 1988, Diploid-triploid mosaics among unisexual hybrids of the minnows Phoxinus eos and Phoxinus neogaeus, Evolution, 42, 649, 10.2307/2408857 · DOI
  15. Lynch, 2000, The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes, Science, 290, 1151, 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Allendorf, 1988, Conservation and distribution of genetic variation in a polytypic species: the cutthroat trout, Conserv. Biol., 2, 170, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00168.x · DOI
  17. Bernatchez, 1995, Introgression and fixation of Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial genome in an allopatric population of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Can. J. Fish. Aquat Sci., 52, 179, 10.1139/f95-018 · DOI
  18. Lehman, 1991, Introgression of coyote mitochondrial DNA into sympatric North American gray wolf populations, Evolution, 45, 104, 10.2307/2409486 · DOI
  19. Vila, 1999, Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus, Mol Ecol., 8, 2089, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00825.x · DOI
  20. Barton, 1985, Analysis of hybrid zones, Annu. Rev. Ecol Syst., 16, 113, 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Leary, 1993, Conservation genetics of bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath River drainages, Conserv. Biol., 7, 856, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740856.x · DOI
  22. Rozhnov, 1993, Extinction of the European mink: ecological catastrophe or a natural process?, Lutreola, 1, 10
  23. Rhymer, 1994, Mitochondrial analysis of gene flow between New Zealand mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and grey ducks (A. superciliosa), Auk, 111, 970, 10.2307/4088829 · DOI
  24. Boecklen, 1997, Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: numbers of markers and power of resolution, Ecology, 78, 2611, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2611:GAOHZN]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. Johnson, 2000, Measuring and interpreting genetic structure to minimize the genetic risks of translocations, Aquaculture Res., 31, 133, 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00396.x · DOI
  26. Land, 2000, Introgression level achieved through Florida panther genetic restoration, Endangered Species Update, 17, 100
  27. Storfer, 1999, Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited, Biol. Conserv., 87, 173, 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00066-4 · DOI
  28. Crandall, 2000, Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology, Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 290, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01876-0 · DOI
  29. Ingvarsson, 2001, Restoration of genetic variation lost – the genetic rescue hypothesis, Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 62, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02065-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P., & Wenburg, J. K.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
613-622
ISSN
0169-5347
DOI
10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x
Cited by
1,533
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review