Cited by 16

To track or not to track? Employees’ data privacy in the age of corporate wellness, mobile health, and GDPR†

Brassart Olsen, Céline·2020·International Data Privacy Law

Abstract

... The latest digital health developments have allowed for a better tracking of individuals’ health through wearable devices and health apps, also known as ‘mobile health’ (mHealth). mHealth companies do not only target individual consumers, but also businesses, as they see a market in corporate health and wellness programs. As such, some employers now offer employees to use fitness wristbands or smartwatches so that employees can monitor their health at work and beyond. These devices and apps enable users to track their exercise, number of steps, sleep patterns, eating habits, and a myriad of other health-related activities, which are typically not connected to work. For example, the Apple Watch Series 5 offers to monitor heart rate and glucose levels, and collects, the user's health information in the user’s iPhone Health app.’1 Employers present mHealth devices and apps as company ‘perks’ for employees. However, the use of mHealth devices may come at a price for employees, who may share their most personal information, namely their health information, with their employer and third parties, such as mHealth developers, and/or insurance companies. For example, an employee may share unwillingly or unknowingly information with his/her employer about his/her diabetes condition, heart disease, or insomnia. Sharing this information with the employer not only affects the employee’s right to privacy and data protection, but also his/her right to non-discrimination, as the employer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/idpl/ipaa004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brassart Olsen, C.
Venue
International Data Privacy Law
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
236-252
ISSN
  • 2044-3994
  • 2044-4001
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review