Cited by 32Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityProbability and Statistical ResearchCoding theory and cryptography

Correction of Overlapping Template Matching Test Included in NIST Randomness Test Suite

HAMANO, K., KANEKO, T.·2007·IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences

Abstract

Accurate values for occurrence probabilities of the template used in the overlapping template matching test included in NIST randomness test suite (NIST SP800-22) have been analyzed. The inaccurate values used in the NIST randomness test suite cause significant difference of pass rate. When the inaccurate values are used and significance level is set to 1%, the experimental mean value of pass rate, which is calculated by use of random number sequences taken from DES (Data Encryption Standard), is about 98.8%. In contrast, our new values derived from a set of recurrence formulas for the NIST randomness test suite give an empirical distribution of pass rate that meets the theoretical binomial distribution. Here, the experimental mean value of pass rate is about 99%, which corresponds to the significance level 1%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.9.1788

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAMANO, K., & KANEKO, T.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
E90-A
Issue
9
Pages
1788-1792
ISSN
  • 0916-8508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1337
OpenAlex
W2025482752
Cited by
32
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
NIST SP 800-22, randomness testing, pass rates, binomial distribution, recurrence relations, random number generators, significance level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review