Cited by 3Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionHealthcare Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Policy analysis: User monitoring of in-vitro diagnostic medical devices used for near-patient testing of infectious diseases

Open access

Abstract

Abstract Background All individuals should have equitable access to accurate and timely testing for infectious diseases, which underpins diagnosis and treatment, safeguards blood supplies, and is used to determine disease prevalence. Disadvantaged populations have limited access to laboratory-based testing, so near-patient or point-of-care testing (PoCT) has been developed and implemented. Unlike laboratory-based testing, PoCT is often performed by non-laboratory staff and outside regulatory frameworks. Quality assurance (QA) of PoCT is often lacking or inappropriate, meaning inaccurate testing can go undetected, leading to poor patient outcomes. Objective To review the application of QA of PoCT use to detect infectious diseases and propose fit-for-purpose alternatives. Method A review of the current QA of PoCT was undertaken by experienced QA providers by mapping the points of failure. Barriers to providing PoCT QA include inappropriate and unstable sample types; expensive shipping to remote sites, including dry ice shipment; cost of international QA programmes; regulatory costs; fixed test events; and a lack of technology for simple, centralized data collection facilitating rapid analysis and reporting of test results. Based on these findings, a novel, fit-for-purpose model of QA for PoCT for infectious diseases is described. Results The new model for QA for PoCT identifies and describes novel sample types, including dry tube samples, dried swabs, or liquid-stable clinical samples that are inactivated and stable at ambient temperature; modified distribution channels; and a method for data collection and analysis using mobile phone technology. Conclusion The findings of this paper seek to describe a fit-for-purpose process, which aims to improve the quality of testing for infectious diseases at PoCT, globally.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijcoms/lyac010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laboratory-based QA is not fit for the purpose of POCTs.

    “Laboratory-based QA is not fi t for the purpose of POCTs.”

    From Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • A recent review identified barriers to POCT sites participating in laboratory-based QA: different sample types, cost, lack of infrastructure, fixed test dates, loss of QA data.

    “A recent review of barriers to POCT sites participating in laboratory-based QA identi fi ed several factors; (a) POCT often use di ff erent sample types to laboratory testing, (b) cost barrier to the purchase, shipping and importation of QA samples to individual sites, (c) POCT sites lack infrastructure required for QA, (d) they use fi xed test dates for QA programs, and (e) a loss of QA data for”

    From Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Johnson, 2017, To err is human, to correct is public health: a systematic review examining poor quality testing and misdiagnosis of HIV status, J Int AIDS Soc, 20, 10.7448/IAS.20.7.21755 · DOI
  2. Shaw, 2021, Identifying and reducing errors in point-of-care testing, Ejifcc, 32, 298
  3. World Health Organization, 2011, Laboratory Quality Management System: Handbook
  4. Lisby, 2021, Point of care testing for infectious disease: ownership and quality, J Antimicrob Chemother, 76, iii28, 10.1093/jac/dkab247 · DOI
  5. International Organization for Standardization, 2016, ISO 13485:2016 Medical Devices – Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Regulatory Purposes
  6. International Medical Device Regulators Forum, 2018, IMDRF Good Regulatory Review Practices Group
  7. World Health Organization, 2015, Essential Medicines and Health Products
  8. World Health Organization, 2021, Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics
  9. Garcia, 2014, Impact of proficiency testing program for laboratories conducting early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in infants in low- to middle-income countries., J Clin Microbiol, 52, 773, 10.1128/JCM.03097-13 · DOI
  10. Terris-Prestholt, 2020, The potential for quality assurance systems to save costs and lives: the case of early infant diagnosis of HIV., Trop Med Int Health, 25, 1235, 10.1111/tmi.13472 · DOI
  11. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2017, Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Medical Devices, Off J Eur Union, 60
  12. Kim, 2009, Identification of performance problems in a commercial human immunodeficiency virus type 1 enzyme immunoassay by multiuser external quality control monitoring and real-time data analysis., J Clin Microbiol, 47, 3114, 10.1128/JCM.00892-09 · DOI
  13. Dimech, 2015, Determination of quality control limits for serological infectious disease testing using historical data, Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, 329, 10.1515/cclm-2014-0546 · DOI
  14. Galli, 2013, Evaluation of the accuracy and ease of use of a rapid HIV-1 Antibody Test performed by untrained operators at the point of care., J Clin Virol, 58, e65, 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.08.024 · DOI
  15. Jani, 2014, Accurate early infant HIV diagnosis in primary health clinics using a point-of-care nucleic acid test., J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 67, e1, 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000250 · DOI
  16. Ndase, 2015, Frequency of false positive rapid HIV serologic tests in African men and women receiving PrEP for HIV prevention: implications for programmatic roll-out of biomedical interventions., PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0123005 · DOI
  17. Baveewo, 2012, Potential for false positive HIV test results with the serial rapid HIV testing algorithm, BMC Res Notes, 5, 10.1186/1756-0500-5-154 · DOI
  18. Wolpaw, 2010, The failure of routine rapid HIV testing: a case study of improving low sensitivity in the field, BMC Health Serv Res, 10, 10.1186/1472-6963-10-73 · DOI
  19. Dimech, 2020, Validation of dried tube sample format quality controls for the monitoring of viral load and blood screening assays, J Virol Methods, 285, 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113957 · DOI
  20. Parekh, 2010, Dried tube specimens: a simple and cost-effective method for preparation of HIV proficiency testing panels and quality control materials for use in resource-limited settings., J Virol Methods, 163, 295, 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.10.013 · DOI
  21. Ramos, 2013, Generation of dried tube specimen for HIV-1 viral load proficiency test panels: a cost-effective alternative for external quality assessment programs, J Virol Methods, 188, 1, 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.11.036 · DOI
  22. Martianez-Vendrell, 2020, Quantification of malaria antigens PfHRP2 and pLDH by quantitative suspension array technology in whole blood, dried blood spot and plasma., Malar J, 19, 10.1186/s12936-019-3083-5 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2002, Stabilized viral nucleic acids in plasma as an alternative shipping method for NAT, Transfusion, 42, 409, 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.00068.x · DOI
  24. Wang, 2013, A 10-year human hepatitis B virus nucleic test external quality assessment in China: continual improvement, Clin Chim Acta, 425, 139, 10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.026 · DOI
  25. Carmona, 2019, Separation of plasma from whole blood by use of the cobas plasma separation card: a compelling alternative to dried blood spots for quantification of HIV-1 viral load, J Clin Microbiol, 57, 10.1128/JCM.01336-18 · DOI
  26. Pham, 2019, Performance of a novel low-cost, instrument-free plasma separation device for HIV viral load quantification and determination of treatment failure in people living with HIV in Malaysia: a diagnostic accuracy study, J Clin Microbiol, 57, 10.1128/JCM.01683-18 · DOI
  27. Dimech, 2018, Comparison of four methods of establishing control limits for monitoring quality controls in infectious disease serology testing, Clin Chem Lab Med, 56, 1970, 10.1515/cclm-2018-0351 · DOI
  28. Dimech, 2020, Does a change in quality control results influence the sensitivity of an anti-HCV test?, Clin Chem Lab Med, 58, 1372, 10.1515/cclm-2020-0031 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dimech, W., Lamoury, F., Ding, X. C., Lastra, L. M., Vincini, G., & Sands, A.
Affiliations
  • National Serology Reference Laboratory, Australia , 4th Floor Healy Building, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
  • FIND (CH)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Dimech, Wayne
Venue
IJQHC Communications
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
ISSN
2634-5293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289519005
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IJQHC Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
point-of-care testing, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, quality assurance, infectious disease testing, user monitoring, sample stability, sample distribution, mobile phone data collection, regulatory challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review