Cited by 113HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHIV Research and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

False positive HIV diagnoses in resource limited settings: operational lessons learned for HIV programmes.

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access to HIV diagnosis is life-saving; however the use of rapid diagnostic tests in combination is vulnerable to wrongly diagnosing HIV infection when both screening tests give a false positive result. Misclassification of HIV patients can also occur due to poor quality control, administrative errors and lack of supervision and training of staff. Médecins Sans Frontières discovered in 2004 that HIV negative individuals were enrolled in some HIV programmes. This paper describes the result of an audit of three sites to review testing practices, implement improved testing algorithms and offer re-testing to clients enrolled in the HIV clinic. FINDINGS: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Burundi and Ethiopia patients were identified for HIV retesting. In total, 44 false-positive patients were identified in HIV programmes in DRC, two in Burundi and seven in Ethiopia. Some of those identified had been abandoned by partners or started on anti-retroviral therapy or prophylaxis. Despite potential damage to programme reputations, no impact in terms of testing uptake occurred with mean monthly testing volumes stable after introduction of re-testing. In order to prevent the problem, training, supervision and quality control of testing procedures were strengthened. A simple and feasible confirmation test was added to the test algorithm. Prevalence of false positives after introducing the changes varied from zero percent (95% CI 0%-8.2%) to 10.3 percent (95% CI: 7.2%-14.1%) in Burundi and DRC respectively. CONCLUSION: False HIV diagnoses were found in a variety of programme settings and had devastating individual consequences. We re-tested individuals in our programmes while instituting improved testing procedures without a negative impact on test uptake. Considering the importance of correct diagnosis to the individual, as well as the resources needed to care for someone with HIV, it is critical to ensure that all patients registered in HIV programmes are accurately diagnosed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0059906

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1993, Unexplained opportunistic infections and CD4+T-Lymphocytopenia without HIV infection, New Eng J Med, 328(6), 373

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shanks, L., Klarkowski, D., & O'Brien, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Médecins Sans Frontières (NL)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Shanks, Leslie
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-20
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e59906
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998715001
Cited by
110
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Medecins Sans Frontieres Field Research (Medecins Sans Frontieres) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
Keywords
rapid diagnostic tests, HIV retesting, confirmatory testing, HIV testing algorithms, Médecins Sans Frontières, resource-limited settings, HIV testing uptake, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burundi, Ethiopia
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Burundi, Ethiopia, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Mass Screening, Sensitivity and Specificity, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Reproducibility of Results, HIV Infections, Prevalence, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Clinical Audit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review