The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Design of Case-Control Studies: The Influence of Confounding and Interaction Effects
Abstract
This paper considers quantitatively the extent to which the interaction or confounding effects of covariates may influence the design of case-control studies with particular reference to sample requirements and the role of matching. For the most part, attention is confined to a dichotomous exposure variable, and a single dichotomous covariate. Adjustment for confounding variables appears to have little effect on the power of a study unless they are strongly (odds ratio of 5 or more) related to both the disease and the exposure of interest, and only in similar circumstances will matching be of appreciable value. Matching also makes only a small improvement in the power to detect interaction effects, except under fairly extreme conditions. Both to control confounding and to detect interaction, the effect of matching may sometimes be to reduce the power of a study. The difference in power between matched and unmatched studies diminishes rapidly as the control-to-case ratio is increased. The implications of interaction effects for sample size requirements are more important. If one aim of a study is to detect interactions, the size of the study will have to be at least four times larger than if attention were confined to detecting main effects of the same magnitude. These conclusions are based on a quantitative evaluation of a wide range of possible situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gene–environment interactions in human diseases
Hunter, D. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1578 · Cited by 1,132
Duncan, L. E., & Keller, M. C. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020191 · Cited by 1,032
Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses;
Brookes, S. T., Whitely, E., Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Mulheran, P. A., & Peters, T. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009 · Cited by 775
Brookes, S. T., Whitley, E., Peters, T. J., Mulheran, P. A., Egger, M., & Davey Smith, G. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5330 · Cited by 580
Test for additive interaction in proportional hazards models
Li, R., & Chambless, L. (2007) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.009 · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- SMITH, P. G., & DAY, N. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 356-365
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2156424902
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Design of Case-Control Studies: The Influence of Confounding and Interaction Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/13.3.356
- The paper
- SMITH, P. G., & DAY, N. E. (1984). The Design of Case-Control Studies: The Influence of Confounding and Interaction Effects. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/13.3.356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.