Cited by 502Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth and Medical StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study

Eriksson, Ingeborg, Undén, Anna-Lena, Elofsson, Stig·2001·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-rating of health is among the most frequently assessed health perceptions in epidemiological research. The aim of this study was to compare different measures of global self-rated health (SRH) with respect to differences in age and sex groups and relations to hypothesized determinants. METHOD: Three single-question measures of SRH were included in a health questionnaire administered to 8200 randomly chosen men and women. Two SRH measures were non-comparative, one with seven (SRH-7) and one with five response options (SRH-5), while the third measure included a comparison with others of the same age (SRH-age). SRH-7 had specified response options only at the ends of the scale, while the other two measures gave specified statements for each option. Comparisons between the SRH assessments were studied with respect to response frequencies, frequency distributions, age and gender differences and differences in associations with hypothesized determinants. RESULTS: The differences between the SRH measures were in most cases marginal. Some diversities may, however, be worth considering: a high drop-out rate for the SRH-7 measure in the oldest age group; a trend that SRH-7 correlated most strongly with the independent variables; SRH-age showed improved health ratings with increasing age but a less skewed frequency distribution compared to the non-comparative measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that non-comparative measures are more appropriate in longitudinal studies and that measures without specified response options might be less suitable for an older study group. The overall impression is, however, that the different measures represents parallel assessments of subjective health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/30.2.326

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 3 Appels A, Bosma H, Grabauskas V, Gostautas A, Sturmans F. Selfrated health and mortality in a Lithunian and a Dutch population. Soc Sci Med 1996; 28: 681-90.
  2. 15 Östergren P-O. Psychosocial Resources and Health. With Special Reference to Social Network, Social Support and Cardiovascular Disease. (Academic thesis.) Malmö: Lund University, 1991.
  3. 16 Idler E. Self-assessed health and mortality: a review of studies. Int Rev Health Psychol 1992; 1: 33-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksson, I., Undén, A.-L., & Elofsson, S.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Eriksson, Ingeborg
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2001-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
326-333
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2126960159
Cited by
502
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
self-rated health, health perception, age differences, sex differences, older adults, health determinants
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self-Assessment, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review