Cited by 123Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Sample size determination for studies of gene-environment interaction

Luan, JA, Wong, MY, Day, NE, Wareham, NJ·2001·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Background The search for interaction effects is common in epidemiological studies, but the power of such studies is a major concern. This is a practical issue as many future studies will wish to investigate potential gene-gene and gene-environment interactions and therefore need to be planned on the basis of appropriate sample size calculations. Methods The underlying model considered in this paper is a simple linear regression and relating a continuous outcome to a continuously distributed exposure variable. Results The slope of the regression line is taken to be dependent on genotype, and the ratio of the slopes for each genotype is considered as the interaction parameter. Sample size is affected by the allele frequency and whether the genetic model is dominant or recessive. It is also critically dependent upon the size of the association between exposure and outcome, and the strength of the interaction term. The link between these determinants is graphically displayed to allow sample size and power to be estimated. An example of the analysis of the association between physical activity and glucose intolerance demonstrates how information from previous studies can be used to determine the sample size required to examine gene-environment interactions. Conclusions The formulae allowing the computation of the sample size required to study the interaction between a continuous environmental exposure and a genetic factor on a continuous outcome variable should have a practical u…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/30.5.1035

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interaction effects require larger sample sizes for adequate power, and power depends on allele frequencies and exposure to early life stress.

    “Achieving sufficient statistical power presents a special challenge because interaction effects require larger numbers of subjects for adequate power (Brookes et al. 2001; Luan et al. 2001; Uher 2008), and power depends on allele frequencies in addition to exposure to ELS (Munafo et al. 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luan, J., Wong, M., Day, N., & Wareham, N.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2001-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1035-1040
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2153848537
Cited by
123
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
sample size determination, gene-environment interaction, statistical power, gene-gene interaction, continuous exposure, continuous outcomes, allele frequency, physical activity, impaired glucose tolerance
MeSH terms
Environmental Exposure, Genotype, Humans, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic, Linear Models, Glucose Intolerance, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review