Cited by 841Historical and modern epidemiology studiesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyPhilosophy and History of Science

Epidemiology Faces Its Limits: The search for subtle links between diet, lifestyle, or environmental factors and disease is an unending source of fear—but often yields little certainty

Taubes, Gary·1995·Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.7618077

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taubes, G.
Corresponding author
Taubes, Gary
Venue
Science
Published
1995-07-14
Volume
269
Issue
5221
Pages
164-169
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2006825115
Cited by
841
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 31
FWCI
244.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
epidemiology, causal inference, observational studies, confounding
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Epidemiology, Humans, Mass Media, Publishing, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Bias, Causality, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review