Impact of a city-wide sanitation intervention in a large urban centre on social, environmental and behavioural determinants of childhood diarrhoea: Analysis of two cohort studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Poor socioeconomic status (SES) increases diarrhoea risk, mostly mediated by lack of sanitation, poor infrastructure and living conditions. The effectiveness of a city-wide sanitation intervention on diarrhoea in a large urban centre in Northeast Brazil has recently been demonstrated. This article aims to explore how this intervention altered the magnitude of relative and attributable risks of diarrhoea determinants and the pathways by which those factors affect diarrhoea risk. METHODS: We investigated determinants of prevalence of diarrhoea in two cohort studies conducted before and after the intervention. Each study enrolled pre-school children followed up for 8 months. For both cohorts, we calculated relative, attributable and mediated risks of diarrhoea determinants by a hierarchical effect decomposition strategy. RESULTS: The intervention reduced diarrhoea and also changed attributable and relative risks of diarrhoea determinants by altering the pathways of mediation. Before the intervention SES was a major distal diarrhoea determinant (attributable risk: 24%) with 90% of risk mediated by other factors, mostly by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure (53%). After the intervention, only 13% of risk was attributed to SES, with only 42% mediated by other factors (18% by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure). CONCLUSION: The intervention reduced diarrhoea risk by reducing direct exposure to unfavourable sanitation conditions. At the same time it altered the effect and mediation pathways of most distal diarrhoea determinants, especially SES. This finding corroborates the importance of public sanitation measures in reducing the impact of poverty on diarrhoea. It also underlines the value of studying the impact of public health interventions to improve our understanding of health determinants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genser 2008 was excluded because it had an ineligible setting (not specific to slum settings, city-wide intervention and outcomes).
“Genser 2008 Ineligible setting ‐ not specific to slum settings, city‐wide intervention and outcomes.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Genser 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Kosek, 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 197
- M lbak, 2000, Danish medical bulletin, 47, 340
- Punyaratabandhu, 1993, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 76, 535
- Genser, 2006, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 17, 658, 10.1097/01.ede.0000239728.75215.86 · DOI · Paper page
- Chowdhury, 1990, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 44, 515
- Yeager, 1991, Journal of diarrhoeal diseases research, 9, 186
- 1997, International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 224, 10.1093/ije/26.1.224 · DOI
- Fuchs, 2002, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 18, 773, 10.1590/S0102-311X2002000300026 · DOI
- Assis, 2007, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 23, 2337, 10.1590/S0102-311X2007001000009 · DOI
- Milroy, 2001, Environment and Urbanization, 13, 235, 10.1177/095624780101300117 · DOI
- 1989, International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, S16
- Rahman, 1985, Lancet, 2, 28, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)83551-6 · DOI
- VICTORA, 1988, International Journal of Epidemiology, 17, 651, 10.1093/ije/17.3.651 · DOI
- Checkley, 2004, Lancet, 363, 112, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15261-0 · DOI
- 2007, BMJ, 334, 782, 10.1136/bmj.39118.489931.BE · DOI
- Clasen, 2007, Journal of Water and Health, 5, 599, 10.2166/wh.2007.010 · DOI
- Pr ss, 2002, Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 537, 10.1289/ehp.02110537 · DOI
- 2003, Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97, 153, 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90104-0 · DOI
- Barreto, 2007, Lancet, 370, 1622, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61638-9 · DOI
- Krieger, 2003, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 659, 10.1136/jech.57.9.659 · DOI
- Teixeira Md, 2002, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 18, 1189, 10.1590/S0102-311X2002000500011 · DOI
- BAQUI, 1991, International Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 1057, 10.1093/ije/20.4.1057 · DOI
- Morris, 1996, American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 582, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008968 · DOI
- Weiss, 2007, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 18, 537, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318093f3ce · DOI
- 2005, 131, 51, 10.1017/S0031182005007353 · DOI
- Strina, 2003, American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 1032, 10.1093/aje/kwg075 · DOI
- Ditlevsen, 2005, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 16, 114, 10.1097/01.ede.0000147107.76079.07 · DOI · Paper page
- Ditlevsen, 2005, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 16, 592, 10.1097/01.ede.0000165814.14012.c9 · DOI
- Fawzi, 1994, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59, 401, 10.1093/ajcn/59.2.401 · DOI
- Curtis, 2003, The Lancet infectious diseases, 3, 275, 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00606-6 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Genser, B., Strina, A., dos Santos, L. A., Teles, C. A., Prado, M. S., Cairncross, S., & Barreto, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Genser, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-23
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 831-840
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2121141048
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (072405/Z/03/Z), 082569/Z/07/Z)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
- Keywords
- childhood diarrhea, sanitation interventions, socioeconomic status, mediation analysis, effect decomposition, urban infrastructure, poverty, preschool children, public health interventions, attributable risk, health determinants
- MeSH terms
- Brazil, Child, Preschool, Cities, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Poverty, Prospective Studies, Risk, Social Class, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Waste Management, Water Purification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review