Cited by 65Child Nutrition and Water AccessUrban and Rural Development ChallengesPublic Health and Environmental Issues

Impact of a city-wide sanitation intervention in a large urban centre on social, environmental and behavioural determinants of childhood diarrhoea: Analysis of two cohort studies

Open access
Genser, B., Strina, A., dos Santos, L. A, Teles, C. A, Prado, M. S, Cairncross, S., Barreto, M. L·2008·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor socioeconomic status (SES) increases diarrhoea risk, mostly mediated by lack of sanitation, poor infrastructure and living conditions. The effectiveness of a city-wide sanitation intervention on diarrhoea in a large urban centre in Northeast Brazil has recently been demonstrated. This article aims to explore how this intervention altered the magnitude of relative and attributable risks of diarrhoea determinants and the pathways by which those factors affect diarrhoea risk. METHODS: We investigated determinants of prevalence of diarrhoea in two cohort studies conducted before and after the intervention. Each study enrolled pre-school children followed up for 8 months. For both cohorts, we calculated relative, attributable and mediated risks of diarrhoea determinants by a hierarchical effect decomposition strategy. RESULTS: The intervention reduced diarrhoea and also changed attributable and relative risks of diarrhoea determinants by altering the pathways of mediation. Before the intervention SES was a major distal diarrhoea determinant (attributable risk: 24%) with 90% of risk mediated by other factors, mostly by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure (53%). After the intervention, only 13% of risk was attributed to SES, with only 42% mediated by other factors (18% by lack of sanitation and poor infrastructure). CONCLUSION: The intervention reduced diarrhoea risk by reducing direct exposure to unfavourable sanitation conditions. At the same time it altered the effect and mediation pathways of most distal diarrhoea determinants, especially SES. This finding corroborates the importance of public sanitation measures in reducing the impact of poverty on diarrhoea. It also underlines the value of studying the impact of public health interventions to improve our understanding of health determinants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyn101

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Kosek, 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 197
  2. M  lbak, 2000, Danish medical bulletin, 47, 340
  3. Punyaratabandhu, 1993, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 76, 535
  4. Genser, 2006, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 17, 658, 10.1097/01.ede.0000239728.75215.86 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chowdhury, 1990, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 44, 515
  6. Yeager, 1991, Journal of diarrhoeal diseases research, 9, 186
  7. 1997, International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 224, 10.1093/ije/26.1.224 · DOI
  8. Fuchs, 2002, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 18, 773, 10.1590/S0102-311X2002000300026 · DOI
  9. Assis, 2007, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 23, 2337, 10.1590/S0102-311X2007001000009 · DOI
  10. Milroy, 2001, Environment and Urbanization, 13, 235, 10.1177/095624780101300117 · DOI
  11. 1989, International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, S16
  12. Rahman, 1985, Lancet, 2, 28, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)83551-6 · DOI
  13. VICTORA, 1988, International Journal of Epidemiology, 17, 651, 10.1093/ije/17.3.651 · DOI
  14. Checkley, 2004, Lancet, 363, 112, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15261-0 · DOI
  15. 2007, BMJ, 334, 782, 10.1136/bmj.39118.489931.BE · DOI
  16. Clasen, 2007, Journal of Water and Health, 5, 599, 10.2166/wh.2007.010 · DOI
  17. Pr  ss, 2002, Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 537, 10.1289/ehp.02110537 · DOI
  18. 2003, Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97, 153, 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90104-0 · DOI
  19. Barreto, 2007, Lancet, 370, 1622, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61638-9 · DOI
  20. Krieger, 2003, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 659, 10.1136/jech.57.9.659 · DOI
  21. Teixeira Md, 2002, Cadernos de sa  de p  blica / Minist  rio da Sa  de, Funda    o Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Sa  de P  blica, 18, 1189, 10.1590/S0102-311X2002000500011 · DOI
  22. BAQUI, 1991, International Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 1057, 10.1093/ije/20.4.1057 · DOI
  23. Morris, 1996, American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 582, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008968 · DOI
  24. Weiss, 2007, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 18, 537, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318093f3ce · DOI
  25. 2005, 131, 51, 10.1017/S0031182005007353 · DOI
  26. Strina, 2003, American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 1032, 10.1093/aje/kwg075 · DOI
  27. Ditlevsen, 2005, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 16, 114, 10.1097/01.ede.0000147107.76079.07 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ditlevsen, 2005, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 16, 592, 10.1097/01.ede.0000165814.14012.c9 · DOI
  29. Fawzi, 1994, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59, 401, 10.1093/ajcn/59.2.401 · DOI
  30. Curtis, 2003, The Lancet infectious diseases, 3, 275, 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00606-6 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genser, B., Strina, A., dos Santos, L. A., Teles, C. A., Prado, M. S., Cairncross, S., & Barreto, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Genser, B.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-07-23
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
831-840
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2121141048
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (072405/Z/03/Z), 082569/Z/07/Z)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
Keywords
childhood diarrhea, sanitation interventions, socioeconomic status, mediation analysis, effect decomposition, urban infrastructure, poverty, preschool children, public health interventions, attributable risk, health determinants
MeSH terms
Brazil, Child, Preschool, Cities, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Poverty, Prospective Studies, Risk, Social Class, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Waste Management, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review