Cited by 57Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyImmune responses and vaccinationsInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

The duration of protection of school-aged BCG vaccination in England: a population-based case-control study

Open access
Mangtani, Punam, Nguipdop-Djomo, Patrick, Keogh, Ruth H, Sterne, Jonathan AC, Abubakar, Ibrahim, Smith, Peter G, Fine, Paul EM, Vynnycky, Emilia +4 more·2018·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: Evidence of protection from childhood Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) against tuberculosis (TB) in adulthood, when most transmission occurs, is important for TB control and resource allocation. Methods: We conducted a population-based case-control study of protection by BCG given to children aged 12-13 years against tuberculosis occurring 10-29 years later. We recruited UK-born White subjects with tuberculosis and randomly sampled White community controls. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using case-cohort Cox regression, adjusting for potential confounding factors, including socio-economic status, smoking, drug use, prison and homelessness. Vaccine effectiveness (VE = 1 - hazard ratio) was assessed at successive intervals more than 10 years following vaccination. Results: We obtained 677 cases and 1170 controls after a 65% response rate in both groups. Confounding by deprivation, education and lifestyle factors was slight 10-20 years after vaccination, and more evident after 20 years. VE 10-15 years after vaccination was 51% (95% CI 21, 69%) and 57% (CI 33, 72%) at 15-20 years. Subsequently, BCG protection appeared to wane; 20-25 years VE = 25% (CI -14%, 51%) and 25-29 years VE = 1% (CI -84%, 47%). Based on multiple imputation of missing data (in 17% subjects), VE estimated in the same intervals after vaccination were similar [56% (CI 33, 72%), 57% (CI 36, 71%), 25% (-10, 48%), 21% (-39, 55%)]. Conclusions: School-aged BCG vaccination offered moderate protection against tuberculosis for at least 20 years, which is longer than previously thought. This has implications for assessing the cost-effectiveness of BCG vaccination and when evaluating new TB vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyx141

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barreto ML, Cunha SS, Pereira SM, Genser B, Hijjar MA, Ichihara MY, et al. Neonatal BCG protection against tuberculosis lasts for 20 years in Brazil 1251. International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2005;9(10):1171-3
  2. Hart PD, Sutherland I. BCG and vole bacillus vaccines in the prevention of tuberculosis in adolescence and early adult life. Final report to the Medical Research Council. British Medical Journal. 1977;2(6082):293-5
  3. Fourth report to the Medical Research Council by its Tuberculosis Vaccines Clinical Trials Committee. BCG and vole bacillus vaccines in the prevention of tuberculosis in adolescence and early adult life. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1972;1972. 46:3- 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mangtani, P., Nguipdop-Djomo, P., Keogh, R. H., Sterne, J. A., Abubakar, I., Smith, P. G., Fine, P. E., Vynnycky, E., Watson, J. M., Elliman, D., Lipman, M., & Rodrigues, L. C.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Whittington Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Mangtani, Punam
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
193-201
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2751693207
Cited by
57
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR (NF-SI-0616–10037)
  • HTA (08/17/01)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • MRC
  • BBSRC
  • PHE
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
BCG vaccine, tuberculosis, vaccine effectiveness, waning vaccine protection, school-aged children, childhood immunization, tuberculosis control, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, BCG Vaccine, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, England, Female, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Time Factors, Tuberculosis, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review