Cited by 117Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Software application profile: mrrobust—a tool for performing two-sample summary Mendelian randomization analyses

Open access
Spiller, Wes, Davies, Neil M, Palmer, Tom M·2019·International Journal of Epidemiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: In recent years, Mendelian randomization analysis using summary data from genome-wide association studies has become a popular approach for investigating causal relationships in epidemiology. The mrrobust Stata package implements several of the recently developed methods. Implementation: mrrobust is freely available as a Stata package. General features: The package includes inverse variance weighted estimation, as well as a range of median, modal and MR-Egger estimation methods. Using mrrobust, plots can be constructed visualizing each estimate either individually or simultaneously. The package also provides statistics such as IGX2, which are useful in assessing attenuation bias in causal estimates. Availability: The software is freely available from GitHub [https://raw.github.com/remlapmot/mrrobust/master/].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyy195

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MR GxE and MR GENIUS have extended and formalised concepts of using gene-environment interactions and enable the estimation of causal effects in more general settings.

    “Two methods, MR GxE and MR GENIUS, have extended and formalised these concepts and enable the estimation of causal effects in more general settings.”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiller, W., Davies, N. M., & Palmer, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Spiller, Wes
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2018-09-12
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
684-690
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2952494466
Cited by
116
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • MRC
  • University of Bristol
  • MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC UU 12013/1, MC UU 12013/9, MC UU 00011/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (108902/B/15/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, summary data, Stata package, median estimation, modal estimation, MR-Egger, attenuation bias, causal inference, genome-wide association study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review