Cited by 57Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth disparities and outcomesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Socio-economic inequalities in life expectancy of older adults with and without multimorbidity: A record linkage study of 1.1 million people in England

Open access
Chan, Mei Sum, van den Hout, Ardo, Pujades-Rodriguez, Mar, Jones, Melvyn Mark, Matthews, Fiona E, Jagger, Carol, Raine, Rosalind, Bajekal, Madhavi·2019·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age of onset of multimorbidity and its prevalence are well documented. However, its contribution to inequalities in life expectancy has yet to be quantified. METHODS: A cohort of 1.1 million English people aged 45 and older were followed up from 2001 to 2010. Multimorbidity was defined as having 2 or more of 30 major chronic diseases. Multi-state models were used to estimate years spent healthy and with multimorbidity, stratified by sex, smoking status and quintiles of small-area deprivation. RESULTS: Unequal rates of multimorbidity onset and subsequent survival contributed to higher life expectancy at age 65 for the least (Q1) compared with most (Q5) deprived: there was a 2-year gap in healthy life expectancy for men [Q1: 7.7 years (95% confidence interval: 6.4-8.5) vs Q5: 5.4 (4.4-6.0)] and a 3-year gap for women [Q1: 8.6 (7.5-9.4) vs Q5: 5.9 (4.8-6.4)]; a 1-year gap in life expectancy with multimorbidity for men [Q1: 10.4 (9.9-11.2) vs Q5: 9.1 (8.7-9.6)] but none for women [Q1: 11.6 (11.1-12.4) vs Q5: 11.5 (11.1-12.2)]. Inequalities were attenuated but not fully attributable to socio-economic differences in smoking prevalence: multimorbidity onset was latest for never smokers and subsequent survival was longer for never and ex smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The association between social disadvantage and multimorbidity is complex. By quantifying socio-demographic and smoking-related contributions to multimorbidity onset and subsequent survival, we provide evidence for more equitable allocation of prevention and health-care resources to meet local needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyz052

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Salisbury CJ, Mercer SW, Fortin M (eds). The ABC of Multimorbidity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, M. S., van den Hout, A., Pujades-Rodriguez, M., Jones, M. M., Matthews, F. E., Jagger, C., Raine, R., & Bajekal, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
  • Health Science Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • University College London (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bajekal, Madhavi
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2019-04-03
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1340-1351
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2919188527
Cited by
57
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Legal & General Assurance Society Ltd
  • National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
multimorbidity, life expectancy, socioeconomic disparities, older adults, small-area deprivation, smoking, healthy life expectancy, survival, sex differences, chronic disease, health disparities
MeSH terms
Multimorbidity, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, England, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty Areas, Risk Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review