The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Carnival of Truth? Knowledge, Ignorance and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Abstract
This article examines the ongoing work of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which is charged with addressing that country’s past policy of attempting forcibly to assimilate indigenous children in residential schools. It examines the TRC’s mandate and its activities while assessing the Commission’s conceptions of truth and reconciliation by placing these ideas in their societal context and explaining how they appear to have been produced. As the article shows, these conceptions reflect the prior struggles of victims against particular Canadian forms of indifference and denial, struggles that have led the TRC to take what recent literature calls a ‘victim-centred’ and, following Mikhail Bakhtin and Teresa Phelps, ‘carnivalesque’ approach. Despite the TRC’s impressive strengths, the author argues that its approach unfortunately fosters the absence of a more detailed and accountability-promoting examination of the agents and institutions responsible for the injustices. Ultimately, this article is about the underlying sociology of knowledge production that shapes the Canadian TRC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability of survivors to speak their truths and be officially validated and acknowledged is crucial after decades of shame, silence, and state denial.
“First, after decades of shame, silence, and state denial, the ability of survivors to speak their truths and be officially validated and acknowledged is crucial (James 2012).”
From Settler Witnessing at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2020) · cites this paper as James 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Genesis and Design1
Nagy, R. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · doi:10.1017/cls.2014.8 · Cited by 52
Settler Witnessing at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
Nagy, R. (2020) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-020-00595-w · Cited by 25
Intra-American Philosophy in Practice: Indigenous Voice, Felt Knowledge, and Settler Denial
Cook, A. (2017) · The Pluralist · doi:10.5406/pluralist.12.1.0074 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- James, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- James, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Transitional Justice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-204
- ISSN
- 1752-7716 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7724
- OpenAlex
- W2326626076
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Transitional Justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
- Keywords
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, residential schools, indigenous children, forced assimilation, truth and reconciliation, carnivalesque, victim-centered approach, sociology of knowledge, knowledge production, accountability, transitional justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review