Cited by 85War, Law, and JusticeMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesMemory, violence, and history

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Carnival of Truth? Knowledge, Ignorance and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission

James, M.·2012·International Journal of Transitional Justice

Abstract

This article examines the ongoing work of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which is charged with addressing that country’s past policy of attempting forcibly to assimilate indigenous children in residential schools. It examines the TRC’s mandate and its activities while assessing the Commission’s conceptions of truth and reconciliation by placing these ideas in their societal context and explaining how they appear to have been produced. As the article shows, these conceptions reflect the prior struggles of victims against particular Canadian forms of indifference and denial, struggles that have led the TRC to take what recent literature calls a ‘victim-centred’ and, following Mikhail Bakhtin and Teresa Phelps, ‘carnivalesque’ approach. Despite the TRC’s impressive strengths, the author argues that its approach unfortunately fosters the absence of a more detailed and accountability-promoting examination of the agents and institutions responsible for the injustices. Ultimately, this article is about the underlying sociology of knowledge production that shapes the Canadian TRC.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijtj/ijs010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability of survivors to speak their truths and be officially validated and acknowledged is crucial after decades of shame, silence, and state denial.

    “First, after decades of shame, silence, and state denial, the ability of survivors to speak their truths and be officially validated and acknowledged is crucial (James 2012).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
James, M.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
James, M.
Venue
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
182-204
ISSN
  • 1752-7716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7724
OpenAlex
W2326626076
Cited by
85
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
20.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Transitional Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, residential schools, indigenous children, forced assimilation, truth and reconciliation, carnivalesque, victim-centered approach, sociology of knowledge, knowledge production, accountability, transitional justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review