Cited by 228Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal testing and alternativesStress Responses and Cortisol

Establishing an appropriate period of acclimatization following transportation of laboratory animals

Open access
Obernier, J. A., Baldwin, R. L.·2006·ILAR Journal

Abstract

Stress associated with transportation has widespread effects on physiological systems in laboratory animals, including changes in the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, central nervous, and reproductive systems. Although short-lived, these changes can confound research if animals are utilized before homeostasis is restored and physiological measures return to normal. Therefore, some period of acclimatization following transportation is generally suggested to restore homeostasis. The following two questions should be considered to establish an adequate period for acclimatization: (1) Will anticipated physiological changes confound the research to be conducted? (2) What is the length of time necessary for confounding physiological changes to normalize? Finding answers to those questions in the literature can be a challenge. Most literature on the physiological impact of transportation involves agricultural animals, although the limited literature in common laboratory animal species generally parallels changes documented in agricultural animals. The literature documents elevated heart rate and weight loss, as well as elevated concentrations of adrenaline, noradrenaline, glucose, cortisol, free fatty acids, and beta-hydroxybutyrate. Carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism (both lipolysis and lipogenesis) are altered, and plasma osmolality, albumen, protein, and pack-cell volume increase. Neutrophilia and lymphopenia are also evident. These measures generally return to baseline within 1 to 7 days of transportation, although animals that are young, severely stressed, and have stress-sensitive genotypes may show altered physiological measures for several weeks. Other measures such as circadian rhythm and reproductive performance may take several weeks to months to normalize.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ilar.47.4.364

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological acclimatisation following transportation of different animals can take anywhere from 24 hours to more than 1 week.

    “Protocols vary depending on species, strain, and outcome; for example, physiological acclimatisation following transportation of different animals can take anywhere from 24 hours to more than 1 week [139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Knowles TG, Warriss PD. 2000. Stress physiology of animals during trans- port. In: Grandin T, ed. Livestock Handling and Transport. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing. p 385-407.
  2. McEwen BS. 2002. The End of Stress as We Know It. Washington DC: Dana Press.
  3. NRC [National Research Council]. 1992. Recognition and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  4. NRC [National Research Council]. 2006. Guidelines for the Humane Transportation of Research Animals. Washington DC: National Acad- emies Press.
  5. Reece WO, ed. 2004. Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals. 12th ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  6. Trull FL, Rich BA. 1999. More regulation of rodents. Science 284(5419): 1463.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obernier, J. A., & Baldwin, R. L.
Affiliations
  • National Academy of Sciences (US)
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Obernier, J. A.
Venue
ILAR Journal
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
364-369
ISSN
1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169343837
Cited by
228
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ILAR Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
acclimatization period, stress response, physiological recovery, cortisol, epinephrine, glucose, lipolysis, lipogenesis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, circadian rhythm, reproductive performance, homeostasis
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Laboratory, Cattle, Goats, Horses, Laboratory Animal Science, Rodentia, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Transportation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review