The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Susceptibility Tests of Anaerobic Bacteria: Statistical and Clinical Considerations
Abstract
In considerations of susceptibilty testing of bacteria, linear regression has been used to relate minimal inhibitory concentration and zone size. Although lacking in statistical validity, this technique has been used for aerobic bacteria. Reports of anaerobic testing show much greater variation about the regression line; the errors of misclassification have not been analyzed. A bivariate “error rate-bounded” classification scheme is proposed for relating minimal inhibitory concentration and zone size of bacteria. This method requires the following clinical input: (1) specification of breakpoints of susceptibility as determined by minimal inhibitory concentrations and the pharmacology of the antibiotic, (2) determination of the relative importance of two types of errors, false resistant classification and false susceptible classification, and (3) determination of the acceptable rate of error of false classification. Based on this input the classification scheme determines the zone size, which gives the minimal error of misclassification with the known data on zone diameter and minimal inhibitory concentration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Humphries, R. M., Ambler, J., Mitchell, S. L., Castanheira, M., Dingle, T., Hindler, J. A., Koeth, L., Sei, K., Hardy, D., Zimmer, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01934-17 · Cited by 773
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Andes, D., Arendrup, M. C., Brown, S. D., Lockhart, S. R., Motyl, M., & Perlin, D. S. (2011) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2011.01.004 · Cited by 334
Pfaller, M. A., Andes, D., Diekema, D. J., Espinel-Ingroff, A., & Sheehan, D. (2010) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2010.09.002 · Cited by 314
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Rex, J. H., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Johnson, E. M., Andes, D., Chaturvedi, V., Ghannoum, M. A., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.3.819-826.2006 · Cited by 258
Espinel-Ingroff, A., Arthington-Skaggs, B., Iqbal, N., Ellis, D., Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S., Rinaldi, M., Fothergill, A., Gibbs, D. L., & Wang, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00134-07 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Metzler, C. M., & DeHaan, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1974-12-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 588-594
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2147673521
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Susceptibility Tests of Anaerobic Bacteria: Statistical and Clinical Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/130.6.588
- The paper
- Metzler, C. M., & DeHaan, R. M. (1974). Susceptibility Tests of Anaerobic Bacteria: Statistical and Clinical Considerations. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/130.6.588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.