Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 773

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests

Open access
Humphries, Romney M., Ambler, Jane, Mitchell, Stephanie L., Castanheira, Mariana, Dingle, Tanis, Hindler, Janet A., Koeth, Laura, Sei, Katherine, Hardy, Dwight, Zimmer, Barbara, Butler-Wu, Susan, Dien Bard, Jennifer, Brasso, Bill, Shawar, Ribhi, Dingle, Tanis, Humphries, Romney, Sei, Katherine, Koeth, Laura·2018·Journal of Clinical Microbiology
DOI 10.1128/jcm.01934-17
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Effective evaluations of antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) require robust study design. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing has recognized that many published studies reporting the performance of commercial ASTs (cASTs) suffer from major design and/or analysis flaws, rendering the results difficult or impossible to interpret. This minireview outlines the current consensus of the Methods Development and Standardization Working Group of the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing regarding best practices for systematic evaluation of the performance of an AST, including the analysis and presentation of essential data intended for publication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.01934-17

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1128/JCM.00635-16 · doi:10.1128/jcm.00635-16
  2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Verification of commercial microbial identification and susceptibility test systems. M52. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; approved standard—12th ed. M02-A13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 27th informational supplement. M100-S28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  5. 10.1007/s10156-012-0424-5 · doi:10.1007/s10156-012-0424-5
  6. 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90037-T · doi:10.1016/0732-8893(92)90037-t
  7. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.03.004 · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.03.004
  8. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.03.012 · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.03.012

Cited by

See all 773

Metadata

Authors
Humphries, R. M., Ambler, J., Mitchell, S. L., Castanheira, M., Dingle, T., Hindler, J. A., Koeth, L., Sei, K., Hardy, D., Zimmer, B., Butler-Wu, S., Dien Bard, J., Brasso, B., Shawar, R., Dingle, T., Humphries, R., Sei, K., & Koeth, L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Published
2018-04
Volume
56
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
DOI
10.1128/jcm.01934-17
OpenAlex
W2793220261
Cited by
773
References
11
FWCI
28.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2023-09-21)
Open access
green
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.01934-17
The paper
Humphries, R. M., Ambler, J., Mitchell, S. L., Castanheira, M., Dingle, T., Hindler, J. A., Koeth, L., Sei, K., Hardy, D., Zimmer, B., Butler-Wu, S., Dien Bard, J., Brasso, B., Shawar, R., Dingle, T., Humphries, R., Sei, K., & Koeth, L. (2018). CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01934-17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.