The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restriction-Endonuclease Analysis of DNA from 15 Giardia Isolates Obtained from Humans and Animals
Abstract
The DNA banding pattern of 11 human and four animal isolates (two beaver, one cat, and one guinea pig) of Giardia were compared by using two related techniques. Patterns were compared after endonuclease restriction of DNA followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining and after Southern blot analysis using recombinant plasmids containing Giardia DNA as probes. Two major groups could be distinguished with ethidium bromide staining of eight isolates. Southern blot analysis, however, could distinguish nine different patterns among the 15 isolates studied. One common banding pattern was seen in six isolates (two animal and four human); the remainder of the isolates were unique, with the exception of two identical isolates from sisters. Three isolates (one from a beaver and two from humans) were markedly different from Giardia with the common banding pattern, whereas the other six unique isolates varied moderately. Beavers and other mammals do not seem to possess their own species of Giardia. This methodology introduces a way of distinguishing one species of Giardia isolate from another and promises to be helpful in epidemiological investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enteric Protozoa in the Developed World: a Public Health Perspective
Fletcher, S. M., Stark, D., Harkness, J., & Ellis, J. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05038-11 · Cited by 434
Cacciò, S. M., De Giacomo, M., & Pozio, E. (2002) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00068-1 · Cited by 400
Thompson, R. C. A., Reynoldson, J. A., & Mendis, A. H. W. (1993) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60207-9 · Cited by 282
Franzén, O., Jerlström-Hultqvist, J., Castro, E., Sherwood, E., Ankarklev, J., Reiner, D. S., Palm, D., Andersson, J. O., Andersson, B., & Svärd, S. G. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000560 · Cited by 232
Molecular epidemiology: A multidisciplinary approach to understanding parasitic zoonoses
Traub, R. J., Monis, P. T., & Robertson, I. D. (2005) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.06.008 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Nash, T. E., McCutchan, T., Keister, D., Dame, J. B., Conrad, J. D., & Gillin, F. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-07-01
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-73
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W1984138253
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restriction-Endonuclease Analysis of DNA from 15 Giardia Isolates Obtained from Humans and Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/152.1.64
- The paper
- Nash, T. E., McCutchan, T., Keister, D., Dame, J. B., Conrad, J. D., & Gillin, F. D. (1985). Restriction-Endonuclease Analysis of DNA from 15 Giardia Isolates Obtained from Humans and Animals. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/152.1.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.