The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Usefulness of a Test for Slime Production as a Marker for Clinically Significant Infections with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Abstract
The usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci and its implications for therapy were examined. Hospital records were reviewed for 59 patients from each of whom more than one isolate of coagulase-negative staphylococci was obtained. In patients with a prosthetic device, 81% of 59 infectious episodes were due to a slime-positive coagulase-negative staphylococci. In contrast, 22 noninfectious episodes (in which the organisms were contaminants) were equally distributed between episodes due to slime-positive or slime-negative isolates (P = .005). Only 32% of infections caused by slime-positive organisms, in contrast to 100% of infections caused by slime-negative organisms, were improved by treatment with antibiotics alone (P = .02). Prosthetic device removal in addition to antibiotic treatment significantly improved the outcome in patients with infections due to slime-positive organisms when compared with treatment with antibiotics alone (93% vs. 32% improvement; P = .00025).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mack, D., Fischer, W., Krokotsch, A., Leopold, K., Hartmann, R., Egge, H., & Laufs, R. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.1.175-183.1996 · Cited by 885
Herrmann, M., Vaudaux, P. E., Pittet, D., Auckenthaler, R., Lew, P. D., Perdreau, F. S., Peters, G., & Waldvogel, F. A. (1988) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/158.4.693 · Cited by 522
Mack, D., Nedelmann, M., Krokotsch, A., Schwarzkopf, A., Heesemann, J., & Laufs, R. (1994) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.62.8.3244-3253.1994 · Cited by 344
Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm
Dunne, W. M., Mason, E. O., & Kaplan, S. L. (1993) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.37.12.2522 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Davenport, D. S., Massanari, R. M., Pfaller, M. A., Bale, M. J., Streed, S. A., & Hierholzer, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-02-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 332-339
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2073735874
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usefulness of a Test for Slime Production as a Marker for Clinically Significant Infections with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/153.2.332
- The paper
- Davenport, D. S., Massanari, R. M., Pfaller, M. A., Bale, M. J., Streed, S. A., & Hierholzer, W. J. (1986). Usefulness of a Test for Slime Production as a Marker for Clinically Significant Infections with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/153.2.332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.