The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm
Open accessAbstract
Using an equilibrium dialysis chamber, we evaluated the penetration of vancomycin, rifampin, or both through a staphylococcal biofilm to simulate treatment of an infected biomedical implant. A biofilm of ATCC 35984 (slime-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis; vancomycin MIC and MBC, 1 and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively; rifampin MIC and MBC, 0.00003 and 0.00025 micrograms/ml, respectively) was established on the inner aspect of the dialysis membrane (molecular mass exclusion, 6,000 kDa). Serum containing vancomycin (40 micrograms/ml), rifampin (20 micrograms/ml), or a combination of both was introduced into the inner chamber of the dialysis unit (in direct contact with the biofilm), and serum alone was added to the outer chamber. Rifampin and vancomycin concentrations in both chambers were determined over a 72-h period. In the absence of rifampin, the concentration of vancomycin in the outer chamber exceeded the MBC for the organism after 24 h, and the MBC increased to nearly 8.0 micrograms/ml by 72 h, demonstrating that therapeutic levels of vancomycin can penetrate a staphylococcal biofilm. However, viable bacteria were recovered from the biofilm after 72 h of treatment with no apparent increase in the MIC or MBC of vancomycin. Similarly, concentrations of rifampin exceeding the MBC were detected in the outer chamber after 24 h of treatment, but viable organisms were recovered from the biofilm after 72 h of treatment. In this case, the rifampin MBCs for surviving organisms increased from 0.00025 to > 128 micrograms/ml. The combination of agents prevented the development of resistance to rifampin, improved the perfusion of vancomycin through the biofilm, and decreased the penetration of rifampin but did not sterilize the membrane. These observations provide evidence that bactericidal levels of vancomycin, rifampin, or both can be attained at the surface of an infected implant. Despite this, sterilization of the biofilm was not accomplished after 72 h of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces
Christensen, G. D., Simpson, W. A., Bisno, A. L., & Beachey, E. H. (1982) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.37.1.318-326.1982 · Cited by 1,410
Widmer, A. F., Frei, R., Rajacic, Z., & Zimmerli, W. (1990) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/162.1.96 · Cited by 315
Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime
Johnson, G. M., Lee, D. A., Regelmann, W. E., Gray, E. D., Peters, G., & Quie, P. G. (1986) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.54.1.13-20.1986 · Cited by 245
Davenport, D. S., Massanari, R. M., Pfaller, M. A., Bale, M. J., Streed, S. A., & Hierholzer, W. J. (1986) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/153.2.332 · Cited by 227
Farber, B. F., Kaplan, M. H., & Clogston, A. G. (1990) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/161.1.37 · Cited by 211
Younger, J. J., Christensen, G. D., Bartleyt, D. L., Simmons, J. C. H., & Barrett, F. F. (1987) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/156.4.548 · Cited by 187
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm as a diffusion barrier to piperacillin
Hoyle, B. D., Alcantara, J., & Costerton, J. W. (1992) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.36.9.2054 · Cited by 162
Hogt, A. H., Dankert, J., Hulstaert, C. E., & Feijén, J. (1986) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.51.1.294-301.1986 · Cited by 127
Staphylococcus epidermidisAdhesion to Hydrophobic Biomedical Polymer Is Mediated by Platelets
Wang, I., Anderson, J. M., & Marchant, R. (1993) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/167.2.329 · Cited by 79
Staphylococcal peritonitis in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis
West, T. E., Walshe, J. J., Krol, C. P., & Amsterdam, D. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.23.5.809-812.1986 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately
Dunne, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002 · Cited by 1,516
Self-citationAnderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1818-1824.2000 · Cited by 958
Tseng, B. S., Zhang, W., Harrison, J. J., Quach, T. P., Song, J. L., Penterman, J., Singh, P. K., Chopp, D. L., Packman, A. I., & Parsek, M. R. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12155 · Cited by 466
Consensus guidelines for the identification and treatment of biofilms in chronic nonhealing wounds
Schultz, G., Bjarnsholt, T., James, G. A., Leaper, D. J., McBain, A. J., Malone, M., Stoodley, P., Swanson, T., Tachi, M., Wolcott, R. D., et al. (2017) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12590 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunne, W. M., Mason, E. O., & Kaplan, S. L.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2522-2526
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2111074810
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.37.12.2522
- The paper
- Dunne, W. M., Mason, E. O., & Kaplan, S. L. (1993). Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.12.2522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.