Cited by 47Gut microbiota and healthBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Capabilities of Gut Microbiome–Based Diagnostics and the Promise of Clinical Application

Open access
Damhorst, Gregory L, Adelman, Max W, Woodworth, Michael H, Kraft, Colleen S·2021·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

There is increasing evidence for the importance of the gut microbiome in human health and disease. Traditional and modern technologies - from cell culture to next generation sequencing - have facilitated these advances in knowledge. Each of the tools employed in measuring the microbiome exhibits unique capabilities that may be leveraged for clinical diagnostics. However, much still needs to be done to standardize the language and metrics by which a microbiome is characterized. Here we review the capabilities of gut microbiome-based diagnostics, review selected examples, and discuss the outlook towards clinical application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiaa689

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is extremely difficult to identify gut microbiota configurations with the required specificity and reproducibility for clinical practice.

    “This makes it extremely difficult to identify gut microbiota configurations with the required specificity and reproducibility for clinical practice 24 .”

    From Human microbiome myths and misconceptions (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Marchesi, 2015, The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal, Microbiome, 3, 31, 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5 · DOI
  2. Willis, 2019, Rarefaction, alpha diversity, and statistics, Frontiers Microbiol, 10, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02407 · DOI
  3. Lozupone, 2012, Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota, Nature, 489, 220, 10.1038/nature11550 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Woodworth, 2019, The role of fecal microbiota transplantation in reducing intestinal colonization with antibiotic-resistant organisms: the current landscape and future directions, Open Forum Infect Dis, 6
  5. Humphreys, 2014, Controlling the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Is active screening worthwhile?, J Hosp Infect, 88, 191, 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.09.002 · DOI
  6. Halpin, 2016, Intestinal microbiome disruption in patients in a long-term acute care hospital: a case for development of microbiome disruption indices to improve infection prevention, Am J Infect Control, 44, 830, 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.003 · DOI
  7. Pettigrew, 2019, Gastrointestinal microbiota disruption and risk of colonization with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit patients, Clin Infect Dis, 69, 604, 10.1093/cid/ciy936 · DOI
  8. Yu, 2017, Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer, Gut, 66, 70, 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309800 · DOI
  9. Taur, 2018, Reconstitution of the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated patients by autologous fecal microbiota transplant, Sci Transl Med, 10, eaap9489, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap9489 · DOI
  10. Schlaberg, 2020, Microbiome Diagnostics, Clin Chem, 66, 68, 10.1373/clinchem.2019.303248 · DOI
  11. Miller, 2016, Development and evaluation of a novel fast broad-range 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing assay for diagnosis of bacterial infective endocarditis: multi-year experience in a large Canadian healthcare zone and a literature review, BMC Infect Dis, 16, 10.1186/s12879-016-1476-4 · DOI
  12. Conville, 2018, The complexities of nocardia taxonomy and identification, J Clin Microbiol, 56, 10.1128/JCM.01419-17 · DOI
  13. Wallace, 2020, Antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria: current state and next-generation solutions, Gut Microbes, 12, 1799654, 10.1080/19490976.2020.1799654 · DOI
  14. Shimasaki, 2019, Increased relative abundance of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae within the gut microbiota is associated with risk of bloodstream infection in long-term acute care hospital patients, Clin Infect Dis, 68, 2053, 10.1093/cid/ciy796 · DOI
  15. Taur, 2012, Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Clin Infect Dis, 55, 905, 10.1093/cid/cis580 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Stoma, 2020, Compositional flux within the intestinal microbiota and risk for bloodstream infection with gram-negative bacteria, Clin Infect Dis, 10.1093/cid/ciaa068 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Langelier, 2018, Integrating host response and unbiased microbe detection for lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in critically ill adults, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115, E12353, 10.1073/pnas.1809700115 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Loomba, 2017, Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Cell Metab, 25, 1054, 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jobin, 2018, Precision medicine using microbiota, Science, 359, 32, 10.1126/science.aar2946 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Langelier, 2019, Microbiome and antimicrobial resistance gene dynamics in international travelers, Emerg Infect Dis, 25, 1380, 10.3201/eid2507.181492 · DOI
  21. Vandeputte, 2017, Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load, Nature, 551, 507, 10.1038/nature24460 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Jian, 2020, Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling, PLoS One, 15, e0227285, 10.1371/journal.pone.0227285 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Galazzo, 2020, How to count our microbes? the effect of different quantitative microbiome profiling approaches, Frontiers Cell Infect Microbiol, 10, 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00403 · DOI
  24. Shakya, 2019, Advances and challenges in metatranscriptomic analysis, Frontiers Genet, 10, 10.3389/fgene.2019.00904 · DOI
  25. Franzosa, 2014, Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111, E2329, 10.1073/pnas.1319284111 · DOI
  26. Schirmer, 2018, Dynamics of metatranscription in the inflammatory bowel disease gut microbiome, Nat Microbiol, 3, 337, 10.1038/s41564-017-0089-z · DOI
  27. Bos, 2013, Volatile metabolites of pathogens: a systematic review, PLoS Pathog, 9, e1003311, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003311 · DOI
  28. Berkhout, 2018, Late-onset sepsis in preterm infants can be detected preclinically by fecal volatile organic compound analysis: a prospective, multicenter cohort study, Clin Infect Dis, 10.1093/cid/ciy383 · DOI
  29. Robinson, 2019, Metabolomic networks connect host-microbiome processes to human Clostridioides difficile infections, J Clin Invest, 129, 3792, 10.1172/JCI126905 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Damhorst, G. L., Adelman, M. W., Woodworth, M. H., & Kraft, C. S.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Kraft, Colleen S
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-12-17
Volume
223
Issue
Supplement_3
Pages
S270-S275
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W3113545051
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI104681, K23AI144036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
gut microbiota, microbiome-based diagnostics, clinical application, next-generation sequencing, cell culture
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Humans, Computational Biology, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Metagenomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review