Cited by 123Influenza Virus Research StudiesBacterial Infections and VaccinesRespiratory viral infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prime-Boost Interval Matters: A Randomized Phase 1 Study to Identify the Minimum Interval Necessary to Observe the H5 DNA Influenza Vaccine Priming Effect

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: H5 DNA priming was previously shown to improve the antibody response to influenza A(H5N1) monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV) among individuals for whom there was a 24-week interval between prime and boost receipt. This study defines the shortest prime-boost interval associated with an improved response to MIV. METHODS: We administered H5 DNA followed by MIV at intervals of 4, 8, 12, 16, or 24 weeks and compared responses to that of 2 doses of MIV (prime-boost interval, 24 weeks). RESULTS: H5 DNA priming with an MIV boost ≥12 weeks later showed an improved response, with a positive hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer in 91% of recipients (geometric mean titer [GMT], 141-206), compared with 55%-70% of recipients with an H5 DNA and MIV prime-boost interval of ≤8 weeks (GMT, 51-70) and 44% with an MIV-MIV prime-boost interval of 24 weeks (GMT, 27). CONCLUSION: H5 DNA priming enhances antibody responses after an MIV boost when the prime-boost interval is 12-24 weeks. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01086657.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jit180

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO, Confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ledgerwood, J. E., Zephir, K., Hu, Z., Wei, C.-J., Chang, L., Enama, M. E., Hendel, C. S., Sitar, S., Bailer, R. T., Koup, R. A., Mascola, J. R., Nabel, G. J., Graham, B. S., & the VRC 310 Study Team
Affiliations
  • Vaccine Research Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Vaccine Research Center
Corresponding author
Ledgerwood, Julie E.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2013-04-30
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
418-422
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2165908776
Cited by
123
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
H5N1 avian influenza, inactivated influenza vaccine, hemagglutination inhibition, antibody response, vaccine priming
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Vaccines, Inactivated, Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus, Vaccines, DNA, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review