Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During 2012-2013: Variable Protection by Age and Virus Type

Open access
McLean, H. Q., Thompson, M. G., Sundaram, M. E., Kieke, B. A., Gaglani, M., Murthy, K., Piedra, P. A., Zimmerman, R. K., Nowalk, M. P., Raviotta, J. M., Jackson, M. L., Jackson, L., Ohmit, S. E., Petrie, J. G., Monto, A. S., Meece, J. K., Thaker, S. N., Clippard, J. R., Spencer, S. M., Fry, A. M., Belongia, E. A.·2015·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the 2012-2013 influenza season, there was cocirculation of influenza A(H3N2) and 2 influenza B lineage viruses in the United States. METHODS: Patients with acute cough illness for ≤7 days were prospectively enrolled and had swab samples obtained at outpatient clinics in 5 states. Influenza vaccination dates were confirmed by medical records. The vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as [100% × (1 - adjusted odds ratio)] for vaccination in cases versus test-negative controls. RESULTS: Influenza was detected in 2307 of 6452 patients (36%); 1292 (56%) had influenza A(H3N2), 582 (25%) had influenza B/Yamagata, and 303 (13%) had influenza B/Victoria. VE was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-55%) overall, 39% (95% CI, 29%-47%) against influenza A(H3N2), 66% (95% CI, 58%-73%) against influenza B/Yamagata (vaccine lineage), and 51% (95% CI, 36%-63%) against influenza B/Victoria. VE against influenza A(H3N2) was highest among persons aged 50-64 years (52%; 95% CI, 33%-65%) and persons aged 6 months-8 years (51%; 95% CI, 32%-64%) and lowest among persons aged ≥65 years (11%; 95% CI, -41% to 43%). In younger age groups, there was evidence of residual protection from receipt of the 2011-2012 vaccine 1 year earlier. CONCLUSIONS: The 2012-2013 vaccines were moderately effective in most age groups. Cross-lineage protection and residual effects from prior vaccination were observed and warrant further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiu647

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
McLean, H. Q., Thompson, M. G., Sundaram, M. E., Kieke, B. A., Gaglani, M., Murthy, K., Piedra, P. A., Zimmerman, R. K., Nowalk, M. P., Raviotta, J. M., Jackson, M. L., Jackson, L., Ohmit, S. E., Petrie, J. G., Monto, A. S., Meece, J. K., Thaker, S. N., Clippard, J. R., Spencer, S. M., Fry, A. M., & Belongia, E. A.
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2014-11-18
Volume
211
Issue
10
Pages
1529-1540
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2140126081
Cited by
281
References
4
FWCI
22.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During 2012-2013: Variable Protection by Age and Virus Type. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/jiu647
The paper
McLean, H. Q., Thompson, M. G., Sundaram, M. E., Kieke, B. A., Gaglani, M., Murthy, K., Piedra, P. A., Zimmerman, R. K., Nowalk, M. P., Raviotta, J. M., Jackson, M. L., Jackson, L., Ohmit, S. E., Petrie, J. G., Monto, A. S., Meece, J. K., Thaker, S. N., Clippard, J. R., Spencer, S. M., . . . Belongia, E. A. (2015). Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During 2012-2013: Variable Protection by Age and Virus Type. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu647

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.