The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Big Data for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Modeling
Open accessAbstract
We devote a special issue of the Journal of Infectious Diseases to review the recent advances of big data in strengthening disease surveillance, monitoring medical adverse events, informing transmission models, and tracking patient sentiments and mobility. We consider a broad definition of big data for public health, one encompassing patient information gathered from high-volume electronic health records and participatory surveillance systems, as well as mining of digital traces such as social media, Internet searches, and cell-phone logs. We introduce nine independent contributions to this special issue and highlight several cross-cutting areas that require further research, including representativeness, biases, volatility, and validation, and the need for robust statistical and hypotheses-driven analyses. Overall, we are optimistic that the big-data revolution will vastly improve the granularity and timeliness of available epidemiological information, with hybrid systems augmenting rather than supplanting traditional surveillance systems, and better prospects for accurate infectious diseases models and forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248506 · Cited by 2,523 · cited 1×
“big data must stay away from the pitfalls of “big data hubris” [21] and complement novel approaches with rigorous statistical and hypothesis-driven analyses.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSalathé, M., & Khandelwal, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002199 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Huynh-The, T., Hwang, W.-J., & Pathirana, P. N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009328 · Cited by 413
“Big data has been proved its capability to support fighting infectious diseases like COVID-19 [29], [30].”
BackgroundBig Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy
Mooney, S. J., & Pejaver, V. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208 · Cited by 325
Adly, A. S., Adly, A. S., & Adly, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19104 · Cited by 138
Janjua, N. Z., Islam, N., Kuo, M., Yu, A., Wong, S., Butt, Z. A., Gilbert, M., Buxton, J., Chapinal, N., Samji, H., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.001 · Cited by 102
Gong, M., Liu, L., Sun, X., Yang, Y., Wang, S., & Zhu, H. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18948 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, S., Chowell, G., Simonsen, L., Vespignani, A., & Viboud, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- suppl 4
- Pages
- S375-S379
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2554926856
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Big Data for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/jiw400
- The paper
- Bansal, S., Chowell, G., Simonsen, L., Vespignani, A., & Viboud, C. (2016). Big Data for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Modeling. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.