Cited by 413COVID-19 diagnosis using AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Survey on the State-of-the-Arts

Open access
Pham, Quoc-Viet, Nguyen, Dinh C., Huynh-The, Thien, Hwang, Won-Joo, Pathirana, Pubudu N.·2020·IEEE Access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The very first infected novel coronavirus case (COVID-19) was found in Hubei, China in Dec. 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic has spread over 214 countries and areas in the world, and has significantly affected every aspect of our daily lives. At the time of writing this article, the numbers of infected cases and deaths still increase significantly and have no sign of a well-controlled situation, e.g., as of 13 July 2020, from a total number of around 13.1 million positive cases, 571,527 deaths were reported in the world. Motivated by recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data in various areas, this paper aims at emphasizing their importance in responding to the COVID-19 outbreak and preventing the severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We firstly present an overview of AI and big data, then identify the applications aimed at fighting against COVID-19, next highlight challenges and issues associated with state-of-the-art solutions, and finally come up with recommendations for the communications to effectively control the COVID-19 situation. It is expected that this paper provides researchers and communities with new insights into the ways AI and big data improve the COVID-19 situation, and drives further studies in stopping the COVID-19 outbreak.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3009328

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

32 of the 182 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [4](2020). arXiv Announces New COVID-19 Quick Search. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.cornell.edu/arxiv/2020/03/30/new-covid-19-quick-search/
  2. [14]C. Zheng, X. Deng, Q. Fu, Q. Zhou, J. Feng, H. Ma, W. Liu, and X. Wang, “ Deep learning-based detection for COVID-19 from chest CT using weak label,” medRxiv, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.12.20027185v2 · DOI
  3. [25]B. R. Barricelli, E. Casiraghi, J. Gliozzo, A. Petrini, and S. Valtolina, “ Human digital twin for fitness management,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 26637– 26664, 2020.
  4. [113]C. Li, C. Li, D. Debruyne, J. Spencer, V. Kapoor, L. Y. Liu, B. Zhang, L. Lee, R. Feigelman, G. Burdon, J. Liu, A. Oliva, A. Borcherding, J. Xu, A. E. Urban, G. Liu, and Z. Liu,“ High sensitivity detection of SARS-CoV-2 using multiplex PCR and a multiplex-PCR-based metagenomic method,” bioRxiv, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.12.988246v1 · DOI
  5. [123]Z. Li, X. Li, Y.-Y. Huang, Y. Wu, L. Zhou, R. Liu, D. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Liu, X. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Cui, X. Wang, and H.-B. Luo,“ FEP-based screening prompts drug repositioning against COVID-19,” bioRxiv, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.23.004580v1 · DOI
  6. [130]S. Offermanns and W. Rosenthal, Eds., IC50 Values. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008, p. 611.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Huynh-The, T., Hwang, W.-J., & Pathirana, P. N.
Affiliations
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Won-Joo
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
130820-130839
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3019283372
Cited by
413
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 56 · 2016: 1
FWCI
41.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korea Government (NRF-2019R1C1C1006143, NRF-2019R1I1A3A01060518)
  • Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation
  • Korea Government (MSIT) through the Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Center, Pusan National University (2020-0-01450)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, artificial intelligence applications, big data, pandemic response, epidemic control, public health communication, epidemic forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review