The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in promiscuity for antibody–FcRn interactions across species: implications for therapeutic antibodies
Abstract
Preclinical tests of therapeutic antibodies are frequently carried out in mice to evaluate pharmacokinetics and efficacy. However, the observation that mouse IgG are cleared rapidly from the human circulation suggests that mice may not always be an ideal model. The Fc receptor, FcRn, regulates the serum half-lives of IgG in mice and most likely has a similar function in humans. In the current study we have carried out an extensive analysis of the interaction of the human or mouse forms of FcRn with IgG from various species using surface plasmon resonance. We show that in contrast to mouse FcRn, human FcRn is surprisingly stringent in its binding specificity for IgG derived from different species. Human FcRn binds to human, rabbit and guinea pig IgG, but not significantly to rat, bovine, sheep or mouse IgG (with the exception of weak binding to mouse IgG2b). In contrast, mouse FcRn binds to all IgG analyzed. The lack of binding of human FcRn to mouse IgG1 has been confirmed using transfectants that have been engineered to express human FcRn on the cell surface. Our results provide a molecular explanation for the enigmatic observation that mouse IgG behave anomalously in humans. These studies have implications for the successful application of therapeutic antibodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Fc receptor structurally related to MHC class I antigens
Simister, N. E., & Mostov, K. E. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/337184a0 · Cited by 729
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
Martin, W. L., West, A. P., Gan, L., & Bjorkman, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00230-1 · Cited by 391
An IgG‐transporting Fc receptor expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast of human placenta
Simister, N. E., Story, C. M., Chen, H., & Hunt, J. S. (1996) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830260718 · Cited by 332
Raghavan, M., Bonagura, V. R., Morrison, S. L., & Bjorkman, P. J. (1995) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00045a005 · Cited by 317
Cited by
FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age
Roopenian, D. C., & Akilesh, S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2155 · Cited by 2,346
Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Wang, W., Wang, E., & Balthasar, J. (2008) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.170 · Cited by 978
Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Lobo, E. D., Hansen, R. J., & Balthasar, J. P. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20178 · Cited by 909
Properties of mouse and human IgG receptors and their contribution to disease models
Bruhns, P. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-01-380121 · Cited by 847
Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies
Ryman, J. T., & Meibohm, B. (2017) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12224 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Ober, R. J., Radu, C. G., Ghetie, V., & Ward, E. S.
- Venue
- International Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1551-1559
- ISSN
- 0953-8178 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2377
- OpenAlex
- W1972018125
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in promiscuity for antibody–FcRn interactions across species: implications for therapeutic antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intimm/13.12.1551
- The paper
- Ober, R. J., Radu, C. G., Ghetie, V., & Ward, E. S. (2001). Differences in promiscuity for antibody–FcRn interactions across species: implications for therapeutic antibodies. International Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/13.12.1551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.