The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current US national discussions on patient safety are not based on a common language. This hinders systematic application of data obtained from incident reports, and learning from near misses and adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To develop a common terminology and classification schema (taxonomy) for collecting and organizing patient safety data. METHODS: The project comprised a systematic literature review; evaluation of existing patient safety terminologies and classifications, and identification of those that should be included in the core set of a standardized taxonomy; assessment of the taxonomy's face and content validity; the gathering of input from patient safety stakeholders in multiple disciplines; and a preliminary study of the taxonomy's comparative reliability. RESULTS: Elements (terms) and structures (data fields) from existing classification schemes and reporting systems could be grouped into five complementary root nodes or primary classifications: impact, type, domain, cause, and prevention and mitigation. The root nodes were then divided into 21 subclassifications which in turn are subdivided into more than 200 coded categories and an indefinite number of uncoded text fields to capture narrative information. An earlier version of the taxonomy (n = 111 coded categories) demonstrated acceptable comparability with the categorized data requirements of the ICU safety reporting system. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) Patient Safety Event Taxonomy could facilitate a common approach for patient safety information systems. Having access to standardized data would make it easier to file patient safety event reports and to conduct root cause analyses in a consistent fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System
Hendee, W. R. (2001) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(01)70072-3 · Cited by 10,103
Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.
Shojania, K. G., Duncan, B. W., McDonald, K. M., Wachter, R. M., & Markowitz, A. J. (2001) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,612
Systems Analysis of Adverse Drug Events
Leape, L. L. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010049034 · Cited by 1,404
Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control
Mayhall, C. G. (2011) · Cited by 1,179
Understanding adverse events: human factors.
Reason, J. (1995) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.4.2.80 · Cited by 938
Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction
Rasmussen, J. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 907
An Operational Classification of Disease Prevention
Gordon, R. (1987) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e659532007-006 · Cited by 860
Weingart, S. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774 · Cited by 652
Understanding and Responding to Adverse Events
Vincent, C. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmhpr020760 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Panagioti, M., Khan, K., Keers, R. N., Abuzour, A., Phipps, D., Kontopantelis, E., Bower, P., Campbell, S., Haneef, R., Avery, A. J., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4185 · Cited by 874
Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: key concepts and terms
Runciman, W., Hibbert, P., Thomson, R., Van Der Schaaf, T., Sherman, H., & Lewalle, P. (2009) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn057 · Cited by 647
Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy
Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2014) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 · Cited by 420
Bickmore, T. W., Trinh, H., Olafsson, S., O'Leary, T. K., Asadi, R., Rickles, N. M., & Cruz, R. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11510 · Cited by 308
Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework
The World Alliance For Patient Safety Drafting Group, Sherman, H., Castro, G., Fletcher, M., on behalf of The World Alliance for Patient Safety, Hatlie, M., Hibbert, P., Jakob, R., Koss, R., Lewalle, P., et al. (2009) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn054 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, A.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-105
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2107809009
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 29.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intqhc/mzi021
- The paper
- Chang, A. (2005). The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.