The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project
Open accessAbstract
ISSUES: The Health Care Quality Indicator (HCQI) Project of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which is aimed at developing a set of indicators for comparing the quality of health care across OECD member countries, requires a balanced conceptual framework that outlines the main concepts and domains of performance that should be captured for the current and subsequent phases of the project. ADDRESSING THE ISSUES: This article develops a conceptual framework for the OECD's HCQI Project. It first argues that developing such a framework should start by addressing the question, 'performance of what-and to what ends?' We identify at least two different major classes of frameworks: (i) health and (ii) health care performance frameworks, both of which are in common use. For the HCQI, we suggest a conceptual framework that is largely a purposeful modification of the existing performance frameworks and which is driven by the health determinants model. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual basis for performance frameworks can be traced back to the health determinants model. A health performance framework takes a broader, societal or public health view of health determination, whereas a health care performance takes a narrower, mostly clinical or technical view of health care in relation to health (needs). This article proposes an HCQI framework that focuses on the quality of health care, maintains a broader perspective on health and its other determinants, and recognizes the key aims of health policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care
Trochim, W., & Kane, M. (2005) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi038 · Cited by 477
Cited by
The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions
Kringos, D. S., Boerma, W. G., Hutchinson, A., van der Zee, J., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-65 · Cited by 720
(2015) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv004 · Cited by 353
Torre, C., Tommasetti, A., & Maione, G. (2021) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-04-2020-0070 · Cited by 46
Tedesco, D., Moghavem, N., Weng, Y., Fantini, M. P., & Hernandez-Boussard, T. (2021) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000615 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Arah, O. A., Westert, G. P., Hurst, J., & Klazinga, N. S.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2098987619
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 64.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intqhc/mzl024
- The paper
- Arah, O. A., Westert, G. P., Hurst, J., & Klazinga, N. S. (2006). A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.