Cited by 58Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Using a logic model to design and evaluate quality and patient safety improvement programs

Goeschel, C. A., Weiss, W. M., Pronovost, P. J.·2012·International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Abstract

Quality improvement programs often pose unique project management challenges, including multi-faceted interventions that evolve over time and teams with few resources for data collection. Thus, it is difficult to report methods and results. We developed a program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and improve safety culture in intensive care units (ICUs). As previously reported, we worked with 103 Michigan ICUs to implement this program, and they achieved a 66% reduction in the median CLABSI rate and sustained the reduction. This success prompted the spread of this program to Spain, England, Peru and across the USA. We developed a logical framework approach (LFA) to guide project management; to incorporate the cultural, clinical and capacity variations among countries; and to ensure early alignment of the project's design and evaluation. In this paper, we describe the use of the LFA to systematically design, implement and evaluate large-scale, multi-faceted, quality improvement programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/intqhc/mzs029

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goeschel, C. A., Weiss, W. M., & Pronovost, P. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Goeschel, C. A.
Venue
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
330-337
ISSN
  • 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3677
OpenAlex
W2166271693
Cited by
58
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal for Quality in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1 UC1 HS14246-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
logic model, patient safety, central line-associated bloodstream infection, intensive care unit, safety culture, program evaluation, project management, multi-faceted intervention, infection control
MeSH terms
Humans, Intensive Care Units, Logistic Models, Catheter-Related Infections, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review