CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98Populism, Right-Wing MovementsGerman legal, social, and political studiesGlobalization and political ideologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Confronting the International Political Sociology of the New Right

Abrahamsen, Rita, Drolet, Jean-François, Gheciu, Alexandra, Narita, Karin, Vucetic, Srdjan, Williams, Michael·2020·International Political Sociology
DOI 10.1093/ips/olaa001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The rise of radical right-wing leaders, parties, movements, and ideas have transformed not only domestic political landscapes but also the direction and dynamics of international relations. Yet for all their emphasis on nationalist identity, on “America First” and “Taking Back Control,” there is an unmistakable international dimension to contemporary nationalist, populist movements. Yet these movements are also often transnationally linked. We argue that a constitutive part of this globality is the New Right's (NR) own distinctive international political sociology (IPS). Key thinkers of the contemporary NR have, over several decades, theorized and strategically mobilized globalized economic dislocation and cultural resentment, developing a coherent sociological critique of globalization. Drawing on the oft-neglected tradition of elite managerialism, NR ideologues have borrowed freely from Lenin and Schmitt on the power of enmity, as well as from Gramsci and the Frankfurt School on counterhegemonic strategies. Against the temptation to dismiss right-wing ideas as “merely” populist and by implication as lacking in ideological and theoretical foundations, we are faced with the much more challenging task of engaging a position that has already developed its own international political sociology and incorporated it into its political strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ips/olaa001

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Banaji, 2013, “Trajectories of Fascism: Extreme Right Movements in India and Elsewhere.”, 215
  2. De Benoist, 2000, “Manifesto of the French New Right in Year 2000.”, Telos, 115, 117
  3. Drolet, 2019, “America First: Paleoconservatism and the Struggle for the American Right.”, Journal of Political Ideologies
  4. Faye, 2010, Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-catastrophic Age
  5. Faye, 2011, Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance
  6. Francis, 2001, America Extinguished: Mass Immigration and the Disintegration of American Culture
  7. Francis, 2015, Leviathan and its Enemies
  8. Grece Collective, 1977, “Pour Un Gramscisme De Droite.”, Éléments, 20, 7
  9. Higuchi, 2014, Nihon-gata Haigaishugi: Zaitokukai, Gaikokujin Sanseiken, Higashi Ajia Chiseigaku
  10. Johnson, 2018, Toward a New Nationalism
  11. Renton, 2019, The New Authoritarians: Convergence on the Right
  12. Rizzi, 1985 [1939], The Bureaucratisation of the World
  13. Saeki, 2005, Rinri to shite no Nashonarizumu: Gurōbarizumu no Kyomu wo Koete
  14. Saeki, 2014, “Amerikanizumu” no Shūen
  15. Takahashi, 2010, “Japanese Neo-conservatism: Coping with China and North Korea.”, Security Challenges, 6, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 98

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Abrahamsen, R., Drolet, J.-F., Gheciu, A., Narita, K., Vucetic, S., & Williams, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Michael
ORCID
Venue
International Political Sociology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2020-02-11
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
94-107
ISSN
  • 1749-5679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5687
DOI
10.1093/ips/olaa001
OpenAlex
W3005828740
Cited by
98
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
FWCI
37.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • International Political Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences Research Council of Canada (435-2017-1311)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German legal, social, and political studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
Keywords
New Right, radical right, nationalism, populism, transnational movements, critique of globalization, counter-hegemony, enmity, Lenin, Schmitt, Antonio Gramsci, Frankfurt School, economic dislocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review