The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confronting the International Political Sociology of the New Right
Abstract
Abstract The rise of radical right-wing leaders, parties, movements, and ideas have transformed not only domestic political landscapes but also the direction and dynamics of international relations. Yet for all their emphasis on nationalist identity, on “America First” and “Taking Back Control,” there is an unmistakable international dimension to contemporary nationalist, populist movements. Yet these movements are also often transnationally linked. We argue that a constitutive part of this globality is the New Right's (NR) own distinctive international political sociology (IPS). Key thinkers of the contemporary NR have, over several decades, theorized and strategically mobilized globalized economic dislocation and cultural resentment, developing a coherent sociological critique of globalization. Drawing on the oft-neglected tradition of elite managerialism, NR ideologues have borrowed freely from Lenin and Schmitt on the power of enmity, as well as from Gramsci and the Frankfurt School on counterhegemonic strategies. Against the temptation to dismiss right-wing ideas as “merely” populist and by implication as lacking in ideological and theoretical foundations, we are faced with the much more challenging task of engaging a position that has already developed its own international political sociology and incorporated it into its political strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pan-African thought is by its very nature international thought, concerned simultaneously with the welfare of Africans on the continent, with continental integration, and with Africa's place in the world ( Abrahamsen 2020 ).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen 2020
In the citing paper
“Sovereignty, in other words, trumped unity ( Abrahamsen 2020 ).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen 2020
In the citing paper
“At the same time, the PanAfricanism of the AU is closer to the radical expressions of unity promoted by the early Pan-Africanists, underlining the fluid, evolving nature and multiple expressions of PanAfrican ideology ( Abrahamsen 2020 ).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen 2020
In the citing paper
“As such, Pan-Africanism, like any ideology, 'is far from monolithic or unified, but contains internal tensions and fissures, multiple variations, and inflections, all adapting and mutating in interaction with global events' ( Abrahamsen 2020 , 57).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen 2020
In the citing paper
“Pushing not only for more nationalistic, sovereigntist economic policies and tighter immigration controls, transnational rightwing movements around the world are also joining forces to ensure more conservative approaches to LGBTQ + rights, family policy, and abortion both within their own countries and within key multilateral institutions like the UN ( Abrahamsen et al. 2020 ; Bob 2012 ).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Calls for unity aside, Pan-Africanism also contains strong nativist strands ( Abrahamsen 2020 ), and African politics has struggled with issues of nativism and other forms of violent identity-based politics that are now understood as wider global challenges beyond the continent.”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Abrahamsen 2020
Citations
Cites
Selections from the prison notebooks
Gramsci, A. (2020) · The Applied Theatre Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-27 · Cited by 9,750
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,445
Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe
Mudde, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492037 · Cited by 4,694
Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory
Cox, R. W. (1981) · Millennium Journal of International Studies · doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501 · Cited by 2,955
Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times
Fullerton, J., & Kendrick, A. (2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim260060051 · Cited by 2,178
Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective
Brubaker, R. (2017) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700 · Cited by 1,178
The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class
Gouldner, A. W. (1979) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16083-9 · Cited by 982
The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class
Gouldner, A. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429494468-13 · Cited by 691
Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right
Fish, G. (2018) · Socialism and Democracy · doi:10.1080/08854300.2018.1509625 · Cited by 659
A genealogy of "Japanese" self-images
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4163 · Cited by 390
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Banaji, 2013, “Trajectories of Fascism: Extreme Right Movements in India and Elsewhere.”, 215
- De Benoist, 2000, “Manifesto of the French New Right in Year 2000.”, Telos, 115, 117
- Drolet, 2019, “America First: Paleoconservatism and the Struggle for the American Right.”, Journal of Political Ideologies
- Faye, 2010, Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-catastrophic Age
- Faye, 2011, Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance
- Francis, 2001, America Extinguished: Mass Immigration and the Disintegration of American Culture
- Francis, 2015, Leviathan and its Enemies
- Grece Collective, 1977, “Pour Un Gramscisme De Droite.”, Éléments, 20, 7
- Higuchi, 2014, Nihon-gata Haigaishugi: Zaitokukai, Gaikokujin Sanseiken, Higashi Ajia Chiseigaku
- Johnson, 2018, Toward a New Nationalism
- Renton, 2019, The New Authoritarians: Convergence on the Right
- Rizzi, 1985 [1939], The Bureaucratisation of the World
- Saeki, 2005, Rinri to shite no Nashonarizumu: Gurōbarizumu no Kyomu wo Koete
- Saeki, 2014, “Amerikanizumu” no Shūen
- Takahashi, 2010, “Japanese Neo-conservatism: Coping with China and North Korea.”, Security Challenges, 6, 21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order
Abrahamsen, R., Chimhandamba, B., & Chipato, F. (2023) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad044 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrahamsen, R., Drolet, J.-F., Gheciu, A., Narita, K., Vucetic, S., & Williams, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Political Sociology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-107
- ISSN
- 1749-5679 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-5687
- OpenAlex
- W3005828740
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 37.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- International Political Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences Research Council of Canada (435-2017-1311)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German legal, social, and political studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Keywords
- New Right, radical right, nationalism, populism, transnational movements, critique of globalization, counter-hegemony, enmity, Lenin, Schmitt, Antonio Gramsci, Frankfurt School, economic dislocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confronting the International Political Sociology of the New Right. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ips/olaa001
- The paper
- Abrahamsen, R., Drolet, J.-F., Gheciu, A., Narita, K., Vucetic, S., & Williams, M. (2020). Confronting the International Political Sociology of the New Right. International Political Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaa001