Cited by 187International Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Science Research and EducationGlobalization and political ideologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions

Acharya, Amitav·2016·International Studies Review

Abstract

This Presidential Issue, with contributions by scholars from Asia, Australia, the Middle East, South America, Africa, Europe, and the United States, illustrates how the idea of Global international relations (IR) could serve as a framework for both scholarly debate and empirical research and analysis. This issue is divided into two main parts. The first part contains nine feature articles that illustrate the multiple dimensions of a Global IR research agenda, overall demonstrating how bringing in non-Western ideas and agency broadens the horizons of existing IR knowledge. The topics covered here include Chinese conceptions of “relationality;” colonial interactions in the Indian Ocean to diffuse Westphalian sovereignty through processes of localization, comparing regionalisms, and norm dynamics in Asia and Europe; and the contribution of intercivilizational dialogues in bridging the West-Rest divide. Together, these articles challenge dominant understandings of these issues in current IR theory and highlight the place and agency of non-Western societies in the global order. The second part of the Presidential Issue, the Forum Section, contains ten short contributions that were drawn from two Presidential Theme Panels at the ISA 2015 Convention in New Orleans. These Forum essays not only highlight the obstacles facing the realization of Global IR, including some traditionalist objections to the whole idea, but also offer some pathways to overcome them. Overall, the Presidential Issue suggests that a Global IR is both possible and desirable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/isr/viv016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most countries in the Global South face challenges in cybersecurity, healthcare, climate change, energy sustainability, and agriculture.

    “Since most countries in the Global South face challenges in cybersecurity, healthcare, climate change, energy sustainability, and agriculture (Acharya, 2016), QTs such as quantum communication, quantum computing, sensing, and materials could provide cutting-edge solutions to these challenges.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 187

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1177/0305829811406574 · DOI
  2. Acharya Amitav 2013. Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics: Whose IR? Oxford and New York: Routledge. · DOI
  3. 10.1111/isqu.12171 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Acharya Amitav Buzan Barry . 2010. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory: An Introduction.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Reflections on and Beyond Asia, edited by Acharya Amitav Buzan Barry . Oxford and New York: Routledge. · DOI
  5. Persaud, 2001, “Race in International Relations, Alternatives, 26, 373, 10.1177/030437540102600401 · DOI
  6. Sil Rudra Katzenstein Peter . 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Acharya, A.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Corresponding author
Acharya, Amitav
Venue
International Studies Review
Published
2016-02-19
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
4-15
ISSN
  • 1468-2486 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-9488
OpenAlex
W2337231862
Cited by
187
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
57.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Studies Review (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
Keywords
global international relations, relationality, Westphalian sovereignty, localization, regionalism, international order

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review