The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions
Abstract
This Presidential Issue, with contributions by scholars from Asia, Australia, the Middle East, South America, Africa, Europe, and the United States, illustrates how the idea of Global international relations (IR) could serve as a framework for both scholarly debate and empirical research and analysis. This issue is divided into two main parts. The first part contains nine feature articles that illustrate the multiple dimensions of a Global IR research agenda, overall demonstrating how bringing in non-Western ideas and agency broadens the horizons of existing IR knowledge. The topics covered here include Chinese conceptions of “relationality;” colonial interactions in the Indian Ocean to diffuse Westphalian sovereignty through processes of localization, comparing regionalisms, and norm dynamics in Asia and Europe; and the contribution of intercivilizational dialogues in bridging the West-Rest divide. Together, these articles challenge dominant understandings of these issues in current IR theory and highlight the place and agency of non-Western societies in the global order. The second part of the Presidential Issue, the Forum Section, contains ten short contributions that were drawn from two Presidential Theme Panels at the ISA 2015 Convention in New Orleans. These Forum essays not only highlight the obstacles facing the realization of Global IR, including some traditionalist objections to the whole idea, but also offer some pathways to overcome them. Overall, the Presidential Issue suggests that a Global IR is both possible and desirable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most countries in the Global South face challenges in cybersecurity, healthcare, climate change, energy sustainability, and agriculture.
“Since most countries in the Global South face challenges in cybersecurity, healthcare, climate change, energy sustainability, and agriculture (Acharya, 2016), QTs such as quantum communication, quantum computing, sensing, and materials could provide cutting-edge solutions to these challenges.”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Acharya, 2016
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 187
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1177/0305829811406574 · DOI
- Acharya Amitav 2013. Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics: Whose IR? Oxford and New York: Routledge. · DOI
- 10.1111/isqu.12171 · DOI · Paper page
- Acharya Amitav Buzan Barry . 2010. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory: An Introduction.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Reflections on and Beyond Asia, edited by Acharya Amitav Buzan Barry . Oxford and New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Persaud, 2001, “Race in International Relations, Alternatives, 26, 373, 10.1177/030437540102600401 · DOI
- Sil Rudra Katzenstein Peter . 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Acharya, A.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Acharya, Amitav
- ORCID
- Acharya, Amitav
- Venue
- International Studies Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-02-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-15
- ISSN
- 1468-2486 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-9488
- OpenAlex
- W2337231862
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 57.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Studies Review (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Keywords
- global international relations, relationality, Westphalian sovereignty, localization, regionalism, international order
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review