The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of β-lactamase-mediated resistance
Abstract
β-Lactams are the most widely used antibiotics, and β-lactamases are the greatest source of resistance to them. An understanding of β-lactamase detection and identification is therefore valuable. Colorimetric, acidimetric and iodometric tests of β-lactamase production are good, rapid indicators of penicillin and ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus, Moraxella and Neisseria spp. These methods can also be applied to Gram-negative aerobic bacilli but are less useful, since the usual question is not whether a β-lactamase is produced by these organisms, but which β-lactamase? Accurate identification of the β-lactamases of Enterobacteriaceae demands gene or protein sequencing, but the broad type of enzyme produced by an isolate can often be inferred from antibiotic susceptibility data. Resistance to ceftazidime or cefpodoxime implies extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., especially if susceptibility to cefoxitin is retained. ESBL production can be confirmed with double disc tests or with various commercial kits. Derepression of AmpC β-lactamases in Enterobacter spp. and Citrobacter freundii is another important mechanism and can be inferred from cross-resistance to β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and to all cephalosporins except fourth-generation agents. Antagonism between cefoxitin and cefotaxime can be used to infer the presence of inducible AmpC enzymes in these species, indicating the risk of segregation of derepressed mutants, but in general this risk is better predicted from accurate speciation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Woodford, N., Ward, M. E., Kaufmann, M. E., Turton, J., Fagan, E. J., James, D., Johnson, A. P., Pike, R., Warner, M., Cheasty, T., et al. (2004) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh424 · Cited by 472
Self-citationThe emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation
Woodford, N., & Ellington, M. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01492.x · Cited by 417
Thabit, A. K., Crandon, J. L., & Nicolau, D. P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.993381 · Cited by 160
Biodegradation of Pharmaceutical Wastes in Treated Sewage Effluents by Bacillus subtilis 1556WTNC
Al-Gheethi, A. A. S., & Ismail, N. (2014) · Environmental Processes · doi:10.1007/s40710-014-0034-6 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Livermore, D. M., & Brown, D. F. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 59-64
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2098021840
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of β-lactamase-mediated resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.59
- The paper
- Livermore, D. M., & Brown, D. F. J. (2001). Detection of β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.