Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections

Tam, V. H.·2002·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, open-label study to delineate a relationship between exposure and outcomes in 36 patients treated with cefepime. Twenty patients had documented Gram-negative infections. Timed blood and urine samples were obtained at steady state to determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Microbiological success was significantly correlated with the proportion of the dosing interval that cefepime concentrations exceeded 4.3 x MIC. Our results support in vitro data that suggest bactericidal activity of beta-lactams is optimized at concentrations approximately 4 x MIC. These results should be validated by large prospective clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkf130

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Tam, V. H.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
425-428
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2142365884
Cited by
262
References
0
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkf130
The paper
Tam, V. H. (2002). Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkf130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.