The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of zygomycosis: current and new options
Abstract
Zygomycosis is a frequently lethal invasive infection in high-risk patients such as the immunocompromised [especially haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients] and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, zygomycosis has also been reported in individuals without known risk factors. The causative fungi are members of the order Mucorales and individual species within this group require a high level of laboratory skill for their identification. These organisms are resistant to voriconazole and also to the echinocandins, and although zygomycosis is less commonly documented than invasive aspergillosis in leukaemic and HSCT patients, there are recent reports suggesting that it has increased in incidence since the introduction of voriconazole. Zygomycosis can present clinically as rhinocerebral, pulmonary or disseminated disease which progresses rapidly. The management of cases is based on early diagnosis, surgical debridement when possible and aggressive antifungal therapy. Based on clinical experience, but without the benefit of comparative studies, liposomal amphotericin B has become the therapeutic agent of choice. Posaconazole is a new orally administered triazole antifungal and the first member of this class to have comparable in vitro activity to amphotericin B against most zygomycetes. Studies of salvage therapy of zygomycosis with posaconazole have yielded promising results and there are additional case reports of successful outcomes using these and other antifungal drugs as combination therapy. Adjunctive approaches that are showing promise but with limited clinical experience are iron chelation and immunotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sabatelli, F., Patel, R., Mann, P. A., Mendrick, C. A., Norris, C. C., Hare, R., Loebenberg, D., Black, T. A., & McNicholas, P. M. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00163-06 · Cited by 491 · cited 2×
“Sabatelli et al.18 tested 86 zygomycetes using the triazoles and amphotericin B, also using the CLSI methodology, and obtained similar results.”
ResultThe immune response to fungal infections
Shoham, S., & Levitz, S. M. (2005) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05397.x · Cited by 392
Cited by
Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Mucormycosis
Petrikkos, G., Skiada, A., Lortholary, O., Roilides, E., Walsh, T. J., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir866 · Cited by 1,452
Nosocomial Fungal Infections: Epidemiology, Infection Control, and Prevention
Alangaden, G. J. (2011) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.003 · Cited by 337
Kontoyiannis, D. P., Yang, H., Song, J., Kelkar, S. S., Yang, X., Azie, N., Harrington, R., Fan, A., Lee, E., & Spalding, J. R. (2016) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-2023-z · Cited by 132
Management of invasive fungal infections: a role for polyenes
Chandrasekar, P. (2011) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkq479 · Cited by 100
Galgóczy, L., Lukács, G., Nyilasi, I., Papp, T., & Vágvölgyi, C. (2010) · Acta Biologica Hungarica · doi:10.1556/abiol.61.2010.3.11 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, T. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- i35-i40
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2155809016
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of zygomycosis: current and new options. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkm429
- The paper
- Rogers, T. R. (2008). Treatment of zygomycosis: current and new options. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.