Cited by 23Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

Antifungal activity of statins and their interaction with amphotericin B against clinically important Zygomycetes

Galgóczy, L., Lukács, Gyöngyi, Nyilasi, Ildikó, Papp, T., Vágvölgyi, Cs.·2010·Acta Biologica Hungarica

Abstract

The in vitro antifungal activity of different statins and the combinations of the two most effective ones (fluvastatin and rosuvastatin) with amphotericin B were investigated in this study on 6 fungal isolates representing 4 clinically important genera, namely Absidia, Rhizomucor, Rhizopus and Syncephalastrum . The antifungal effects of statins revealed substantial differences. The synthetic statins proved to be more effective than the fungal metabolites. All investigated strains proved to be sensitive to fluvastatin. Fluvastatin and rosuvastatin acted synergistically and additively with amphotericin B in inhibiting the fungal growth in clinically available concentration ranges. Results suggest that statins combined with amphotericin B have a therapeutic potential against fungal infections caused by Zygomycetes species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/abiol.61.2010.3.11

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural statins (e.g. SIM and LOV) mainly exert antifungal activity in their active metabolite forms (hydrolysis of the lactone ring at pH 10) and are less effective as pro-drugs.

    “The natural statins (e.g.SIM and LOV) mainly effect their antifungal activity in their active metabolite forms (hydrolysis of the lactone ring at pH 10), and they proved to be less effective as pro-drugs [18,19] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Generally, synthetic statins are more effective than natural statins.

    “Generally, the synthetic statins are more effective than the natural ones [18,19] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [19]

  • The inhibition activity of statins on the growth of filamentous fungi was revealed in several zygomycetous and ascomycetous fungal species.

    “The inhibition activity of statins on the growth of filamentous fungi was revealed in the cases of several zygo- [18,19,28,[31][32][33][34][35] and ascomycetous fungal species [18,25,28,29,36,37] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Synergistic and additive interactions were revealed between statins and antifungal agents in zygomycetous fungal species.

    “Synergistic and additive interactions were revealed between statins and antifungal agents in the case of zygomycetous fungal species [18,19,28,29,33] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [19]

  • In vitro, FLV and ROS acted synergistically and additively with AMB in inhibiting growth of Zygomycetes over clinically available concentration ranges in human serum.

    “In vitro, FLV and ROS acted synergistically and additively with AMB in inhibiting the growth of fungi belonging to Zygomycetes over their clinically available concentration ranges in human serum [19] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galgóczy, L., Lukács, G., Nyilasi, I., Papp, T., & Vágvölgyi, C.
Affiliations
University of Szeged (HU)
Venue
Acta Biologica Hungarica
Published
2010-09
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
356-365
ISSN
  • 0001-5288 (ISSN-L)
  • 0236-5383
  • 1588-256X
OpenAlex
W1965076080
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Biologica Hungarica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Nemzeti Kutatási és Technológiai Hivatal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Keywords
statins, fluvastatin, rosuvastatin, amphotericin B, Zygomycetes, antifungal activity, drug synergy, combination therapy, Absidia, Rhizomucor, Rhizopus, Syncephalastrum, fungal metabolites, fungal infection
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Drug Interactions, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mucorales, Rhizopus, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Absidia, Zygomycosis, Rhizomucor, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review