Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections

Open access
Meers, P., Neville, M., Malinin, V., Scotto, A. W., Sardaryan, G., Kurumunda, R., Mackinson, C., James, G., Fisher, S., Perkins, W. R.·2008·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients are intractable antibiotic targets because of their biofilm mode of growth. We have investigated the biofilm penetration, mechanism of drug release and in vivo antimicrobial activity of a unique nanoscale liposomal formulation of amikacin designed specifically for nebulization and inhaled delivery. METHODS: Penetration of fluorescently labelled liposomes into sputum or P. aeruginosa (PA3064) biofilms was monitored by a filter assay and by epifluorescence or confocal scanning laser microscopy. Amikacin release in vitro and rat lung levels after inhalation of nebulized material were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. A 14 day agar bead model of chronic Pseudomonas lung infection in rats was used to assess the efficacy of liposomal amikacin versus free aminoglycosides in the reduction of bacterial count. RESULTS: Fluorescent liposomes penetrated readily into biofilms and infected mucus, whereas larger (1 microm) fluorescent beads did not. Amikacin release from liposomes was mediated by sputum or Pseudomonas biofilm supernatants. Rhamnolipids were implicated as the major releasing factors in these supernatants, active at one rhamnolipid per several hundred lipids within the liposomes. Inhaled liposomal amikacin was released in a slow, sustained manner in normal rat lungs and was orders of magnitude more efficacious than inhaled free amikacin in infected lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Penetration of biofilm and targeted, sustained release from liposomes can explain the superior in vivo efficacy of inhaled liposomal amikacin versus free drug observed in a 14 day infection model. Inhaled liposomal amikacin may represent an important therapy for chronic lung infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkn059

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Meers, P., Neville, M., Malinin, V., Scotto, A. W., Sardaryan, G., Kurumunda, R., Mackinson, C., James, G., Fisher, S., & Perkins, W. R.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2008-02-04
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
859-868
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2144814819
Cited by
345
References
2
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkn059
The paper
Meers, P., Neville, M., Malinin, V., Scotto, A. W., Sardaryan, G., Kurumunda, R., Mackinson, C., James, G., Fisher, S., & Perkins, W. R. (2008). Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.