Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A case-control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection

Open access
Wilcox, M. H., Mooney, L., Bendall, R., Settle, C. D., Fawley, W. N.·2008·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for community-associated Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: Prospective surveillance of community-derived faecal samples for C. difficile cytotoxin, followed by a questionnaire-based case-control study in two distinct patient cohorts (one semi-rural and the other urban). RESULTS: The proportion of randomly selected faecal samples positive for C. difficile cytotoxin was 2.1% in both patient cohorts (median ages 73 and 45 years for the urban and semi-rural cohorts, respectively). Exposure to antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks, particularly multiple agents (P < 0.001), aminopenicillins (P < 0.05) and oral cephalosporins (P < 0.05), was significantly more frequent among cases than controls. Hospitalization in the preceding 6 months was significantly associated with CDI (45% versus 23%; P = 0.022). However, almost half the cases had not received antibiotic therapy in the month before C. difficile detection, and approximately one-third neither had exposure to antibiotics nor recent hospitalization. Contact with infants aged < or =2 years was significantly associated with CDI (14% versus 2%; P = 0.02). Prior exposure to gastrointestinal-acting drugs (proton pump inhibitor, H2 antagonist or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory) was not significantly more common in CDI cases. C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 caused 60% and 13% of urban and semi-rural community-associated CDI cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on antibiotic history and age (> or =65 years) will contribute to missed diagnoses of community-associated CDI. Potential risk factors for community-associated CDI should be explored further to explain the large proportion of cases not linked to recent antibiotic therapy or hospitalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkn163

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Wilcox, M. H., Mooney, L., Bendall, R., Settle, C. D., & Fawley, W. N.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2008-01-31
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
388-396
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2128490444
Cited by
372
References
1
FWCI
17.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A case-control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkn163
The paper
Wilcox, M. H., Mooney, L., Bendall, R., Settle, C. D., & Fawley, W. N. (2008). A case-control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.