The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting antimicrobial susceptibilities for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates using whole genomic sequence data
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Whole-genome sequencing potentially represents a single, rapid and cost-effective approach to defining resistance mechanisms and predicting phenotype, and strain type, for both clinical and epidemiological purposes. This retrospective study aimed to determine the efficacy of whole genome-based antimicrobial resistance prediction in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: Seventy-four E. coli and 69 K. pneumoniae bacteraemia isolates from Oxfordshire, UK, were sequenced (Illumina HiSeq 2000). Resistance phenotypes were predicted from genomic sequences using BLASTn-based comparisons of de novo-assembled contigs with a study database of >100 known resistance-associated loci, including plasmid-associated and chromosomal genes. Predictions were made for seven commonly used antimicrobials: amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and meropenem. Comparisons were made with phenotypic results obtained in duplicate by broth dilution (BD Phoenix). Discrepancies, either between duplicate BD Phoenix results or between genotype and phenotype, were resolved with gradient diffusion analyses. RESULTS: A wide variety of antimicrobial resistance genes were identified, including blaCTX-M, blaLEN, blaOKP, blaOXA, blaSHV, blaTEM, aac(3')-Ia, aac-(3')-IId, aac-(3')-IIe, aac(6')-Ib-cr, aadA1a, aadA4, aadA5, aadA16, aph(6')-Id, aph(3')-Ia, qnrB and qnrS, as well as resistance-associated mutations in chromosomal gyrA and parC genes. The sensitivity of genome-based resistance prediction across all antibiotics for both species was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and the specificity was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). Very major and major error rates were 1.2% and 2.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our method was as sensitive and specific as routinely deployed phenotypic methods. Validation against larger datasets and formal assessments of cost and turnaround time in a routine laboratory setting are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes
Zankari, E., Hasman, H., Cosentino, S., Vestergaard, M., Rasmussen, S., Lund, O., Aarestrup, F. M., & Larsen, M. V. (2012) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dks261 · Cited by 4,980
Cited by
Florensa, A. F., Kaas, R. S., Clausen, P. T. L. C., Aytan-Aktug, D., & Aarestrup, F. M. (2022) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000748 · Cited by 695
Ellington, M. J., Ekelund, O., Aarestrup, F. M., Canton, R., Doumith, M., Giske, C., Grundman, H., Hasman, H., Holden, M. T. G., Hopkins, K. L., et al. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.012 · Cited by 603
Self-citationGoldberg, B., Sichtig, H., Geyer, C., Ledeboer, N., & Weinstock, G. M. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01888-15 · Cited by 360
Lam, M. M. C., Wyres, K. L., Duchêne, S., Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gan, Y.-H., Hoh, C.-H., Archuleta, S., Molton, J. S., Kalimuddin, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05114-7 · Cited by 348
AbuOun, M., Stubberfield, E. J., Duggett, N. A., Kirchner, M., Dormer, L., Nunez-Garcia, J., Randall, L. P., Lemma, F., Crook, D. W., Teale, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx286 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoesser, N., Batty, E. M., Eyre, D. W., Morgan, M., Wyllie, D. H., Del Ojo Elias, C., Johnson, J. R., Walker, A. S., Peto, T. E. A., & Crook, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-30
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2234-2244
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2137413050
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting antimicrobial susceptibilities for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates using whole genomic sequence data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkt180
- The paper
- Stoesser, N., Batty, E. M., Eyre, D. W., Morgan, M., Wyllie, D. H., Del Ojo Elias, C., Johnson, J. R., Walker, A. S., Peto, T. E. A., & Crook, D. W. (2013). Predicting antimicrobial susceptibilities for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates using whole genomic sequence data. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.