Cited by 105Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsInfection Control in Healthcare

The mother as most important risk factor for colonization of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with extended-spectrum -lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E)

Denkel, L. A., Schwab, F., Kola, A., Leistner, R., Garten, L., von Weizsacker, K., Geffers, C., Gastmeier, P. +1 more·2014·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in very low birth weight (VLBW; Methods This investigation was conducted in the perinatal centre at the Charité Berlin between May 2012 and June 2013. VLBW infants and their mothers were screened for colonization with ESBL-E and MRSA. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the German nationwide surveillance system for nosocomial infections in VLBW infants (NEO-KISS) and used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Of 209 VLBW infants, 12 (5.7%) were colonized with ESBL-E. Eighteen of 209 (8.6%) ESBL-E-tested neonates were related to an ESBL-E-positive mother. Univariate analysis, strain typing and multivariate analysis (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.1-26.7, P = 0.002) identified an ESBL-E-positive mother and maternal-neonatal transmission as a main source of colonization. The prevalence of MRSA was 2.3% (5 of 221) among VLBW infants. One of the 221 (0.5%) MRSA-tested neonates was related to an MRSA-positive mother. No risk factors for transmission of MRSA could be detected in this study. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that maternal-neonatal transmission of ESBL-E from mother to child is an important risk factor for colonization of VLBW infants. As a consequence, routine ESBL-E screening of neonates and mothers should be considered as a means…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dku097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denkel, L. A., Schwab, F., Kola, A., Leistner, R., Garten, L., von Weizsacker, K., Geffers, C., Gastmeier, P., & Piening, B.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Denkel, L. A.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2014-04-11
Volume
69
Issue
8
Pages
2230-2237
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2022063393
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Enterobacteriaceae, very low birth weight infants, maternal colonization, mother-to-child transmission, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, neonatal colonization, risk factors, newborn screening, neonatal infection
MeSH terms
beta-Lactamases, Cross Infection, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Mothers, Risk Factors, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review