Cited by 82Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

In vitro activity of rezafungin against common and rare Candida species and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Tóth, Zoltán, Forgács, Lajos, Locke, Jeffrey B, Kardos, Gábor, Nagy, Fruzsina, Kovács, Renátó, Szekely, Adrien, Borman, Andrew M +1 more·2019·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Background: Rezafungin is a novel echinocandin with excellent activity against common Candida species; however, limited data are available regarding rare Candida species. Methods: We determined the in vitro susceptibility of 689 clinical isolates of 5 common and 19 rare Candida species, as well as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The activity of rezafungin was compared with that of anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B and fluconazole, using CLSI broth microdilution methodology (Fourth Edition: M27). Results: Rezafungin MIC90 values were 0.06 mg/L for Candida albicans (n=125), Candida tropicalis (n=51), Candida dubliniensis (n=22), Candida inconspicua (n=41), Candida sojae (n=10), Candida lipolytica (n=10) and Candida pulcherrima (n=10), 0.12 mg/L for Candida glabrata (n=81), Candida krusei (n=53), Candida kefyr (n=52) and Candida fabianii (n=15), 0.25 mg/L for Candida lusitaniae (n=46) and Candida auris (n=19), 0.5 mg/L for Candida metapsilosis (n=15) and S. cerevisiae (n=21), 1 mg/L for Candida orthopsilosis (n=15) and Candida guilliermondii (n=27) and 2 mg/L for Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto (n=59). Caspofungin MIC90 values were 0.25–2 mg/L for all species, while micafungin and anidulafungin MIC90 values were similar to those of rezafungin. Fluconazole resistance was found in C. albicans (5.6%) and C. glabrata (4.9%); rezafungin was effective against these isolates as well. Amphotericin B MIC values did not exceed 2 mg/L. Conclusions: Rezafungin showed excellent in vitro activity against both WT and azole-resistant Candida species, as well as against S. cerevisiae. Rezafungin had similar activity to other echinocandins (excluding caspofungin) against common Candida species and, notably, against clinically relevant uncommon Candida species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkz390

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rezafungin demonstrates potent in vitro activity against wild-type and azole-resistant Candida species.

    “Like other echinocandins, RZF demonstrates potent in vitro activity against wild-type and azole-resistant Candida species [32, 33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts—Fourth Edition: M27 CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2017.
  2. [11]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts—First Edition: M60 CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2017.
  3. [12]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing—Second Edition: M59 CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tóth, Z., Forgács, L., Locke, J. B., Kardos, G., Nagy, F., Kovács, R., Szekely, A., Borman, A. M., & Majoros, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
  • Cidara Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • UK National Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL), Public Health England South-West, Bristol, UK
  • Public Health England (GB)
Corresponding author
Majoros, László
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
3505-3510
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2973507618
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
rezafungin, echinocandins, Candida, Candida auris, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida dubliniensis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, Candida metapsilosis, Candida kefyr, Candida lusitaniae, Candida krusei, Yarrowia lipolytica, Candida inconspicua, Candida pulcherrima
MeSH terms
Candida parapsilosis, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review