Cited by 212Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareSchool Choice and PerformanceAfrican Education and Politics

Education in Africa: What Are We Learning?

Open access
Evans, David K, Mendez Acosta, Amina·2021·Journal of African Economies

Abstract

Countries across Africa continue to face major challenges in education. In this review, we examine 145 recent empirical studies (from 2014 onward) on how to increase access to and improve the quality of education across the continent, specifically examining how these studies update previous research findings. We find that 64% of the studies evaluate government-implemented programs, 36% include detailed cost analysis and 35% evaluate multiple treatment arms. We identify several areas where new studies provide rigorous evidence on topics that do not figure prominently in earlier evidence syntheses. New evidence shows promising impacts of structured pedagogy interventions (which typically provide a variety of inputs, such as lesson plans and training for teachers together with new materials for students) and of mother tongue instruction interventions, as well as from a range of teacher programs, including both remunerative (pay-for-performance of various designs) and non-remunerative (coaching and certain types of training) programs. School feeding delivers gains in both access and learning. New studies also show long-term positive impacts of eliminating school fees for primary school and positive impacts of eliminating fees in secondary school. Education technology interventions have decidedly mixed impacts, as do school grant programs and programs providing individual learning inputs (e.g., uniforms or textbooks).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jae/ejaa009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chosen covariates have been shown to be important drivers of educational outcomes at secondary level.

    “The chosen covariates have been shown by studies, such as Evans and Mendez Acosta (2021), to be important drivers of educational outcomes at secondary level.”

    From A multilevel analysis of educational transition rates at secondary level in sub-Saharan Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Evans and Mendez Acosta (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D. K., & Mendez Acosta, A.
Affiliations
  • Center for Global Development (US)
  • Center for Global Development, Washington DC, USA
Corresponding author
Evans, David K
Venue
Journal of African Economies
Published
2020-11-24
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
13-54
ISSN
  • 0963-8024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3723
OpenAlex
W3110698423
Cited by
212
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
32.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of African Economies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
Keywords
African education, access to education, educational quality, mother tongue education, teacher education curriculum, performance-based pay, teacher coaching, school meals, educational technology, school grants, government education programs, cost analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review