Staged microbial consortium valorizes cattle manure wastewater and promotes maize growth
Abstract
Aims: Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria play important roles in nitrogen transformation and agricultural-waste valorization; however, their large-scale application is often limited by high cultivation costs and insufficient functional stability. This study aimed to develop a low-cost and stable microbial consortium for converting cattle manure wastewater into a bioactive fermentation broth and to investigate its underlying mechanisms. Methods and Results: The heterotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Ensifer sp. S2-8-1 was used as the core strain, and Bacillus subtilis was employed as the auxiliary strain. Three cultivation systems were compared: S2-8-1 monoculture, simultaneous co-culture, and a staged consortium (SYC). Among them, SYC exhibited the best overall performance, maintaining the highest viable bacterial density and reaching 3.93 × 107 CFU ml−1 on day 12. In a soil–maize pot experiment, SYC significantly enhanced rhizosphere nitrification, increased NO3−-N availability, and promoted maize growth, resulting in a 41.4% increase in whole-plant dry matter compared with the water control. The consortium also improved photosynthetic performance and cytokinin accumulation. Comparative metatranscriptomic analysis revealed significant upregulation of heterotrophic ammonia oxidation-related genes (CYP450) and cytokinin-related genes (miaA and LOG) in S2-8-1 under SYC conditions, suggesting coordinated activation of nitrogen transformation and plant growth-promoting signaling pathways. Conclusions: The staged “pre-modification followed by synergy” consortium effectively converts cattle manure wastewater into a stable and bioactive fermentation broth, enhancing both microbial biomass production and plant growth-promoting activity. This strategy provides a scalable approach for livestock wastewater valorization and the development of compound microbial fertilizers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Nkoa, R. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, X., Cao, J., Ni, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, L., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xiaoling
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-06-24
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W7165729781
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1304326)
- Natural Science Foundation of Henan Provincial (242300421242)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
- Keywords
- microbial consortia, Bacillus subtilis, nitrogen transformation, photosynthesis, CYP450 genes, metatranscriptomics
- MeSH terms
- Ammonia, Animals, Bacteria, Cattle, Zea mays, Fermentation, Manure, Nitrogen, Nitrification, Microbial Consortia, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review