Cited by 940Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review

Open access
Nkoa, Roger·2014·Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nkoa, R.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Nkoa, Roger
Venue
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Published
2013-12-13
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
473-492
ISSN
  • 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1774-0746
OpenAlex
W2105824871
Cited by
940
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4
FWCI
27.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
digestate, biogas digestate, organic fertilizer, organic amendments, soil fertilization, environmental risk, human health risk, ammonia emissions, heavy metal contamination, copper, zinc, manganese toxicity, co-digestion, nitrate contamination, soil carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review