Cited by 15Machine Learning in HealthcareMental Health via WritingTopic Modeling

Automated Identification of Eviction Status From Electronic Health Record Notes

Open access
Yao, Zonghai, Tsai, Jack, Liu, Weisong, Levy, David A, Druhl, Emily, Reisman, Joel I, Yu, Hong·2023·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: Evictions are important social and behavioral determinants of health. Evictions are associated with a cascade of negative events that can lead to unemployment, housing insecurity/homelessness, long-term poverty, and mental health problems. In this study, we developed a natural language processing system to automatically detect eviction status from electronic health record (EHR) notes. Materials and Methods: We first defined eviction status (eviction presence and eviction period) and then annotated eviction status in 5000 EHR notes from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We developed a novel model, KIRESH, that has shown to substantially outperform other state-of-the-art models such as fine-tuning pretrained language models like BioBERT and Bio_ClinicalBERT. Moreover, we designed a novel prompt to further improve the model performance by using the intrinsic connection between the 2 subtasks of eviction presence and period prediction. Finally, we used the Temperature Scaling-based Calibration on our KIRESH-Prompt method to avoid overconfidence issues arising from the imbalance dataset. Results: KIRESH-Prompt substantially outperformed strong baseline models including fine-tuning the Bio_ClinicalBERT model to achieve 0.74672 MCC, 0.71153 Macro-F1, and 0.83396 Micro-F1 in predicting eviction period and 0.66827 MCC, 0.62734 Macro-F1, and 0.7863 Micro-F1 in predicting eviction presence. We also conducted additional experiments on a benchmark social determinants of health (SBDH) dataset to demonstrate the generalizability of our methods. Conclusion and Future Work: KIRESH-Prompt has substantially improved eviction status classification. We plan to deploy KIRESH-Prompt to the VHA EHRs as an eviction surveillance system to help address the US Veterans’ housing insecurity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocad081

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Chen Q, Peng Y, Lu Z. BioSentVec: creating sentence embeddings for biomedical texts. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). IEEE; 2019: 1-5; Xi'an, China.
  2. Alsentzer E, Murphy J, Boag W, et al. Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop; Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019: 72-8; Minneapolis, MI.
  3. Alzoubi H, Ramzan N, Alzubi R, Mesbahi E. An automated system for identifying alcohol use status from clinical text. In: 2018 Inter- national Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communica- tions Engineering (iCCECE). IEEE; 2018: 41-46; Southend, UK.
  4. Carrero F, Hidalgo J, Puertas E, Maña M, Mata J. Quick prototyp- ing of high performance text classifiers. In: i2b2 Workshop on Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data. 2006; Massachusetts, USA.
  5. Pedersen T. Determining smoker status using supervised and unsu- pervised learning with lexical features. In: i2b2 Workshop on Chal- lenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data. Citeseer; 2006; Massachusetts, USA.
  6. Jonnagaddala J, Dai HJ, Ray P, Liaw ST. A preliminary study on automatic identification of patient smoking status in unstructured electronic health records. In: Proceedings of BioNLP 15. 2015: 147-151; Beijing, China.
  7. Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013. · arXiv
  8. Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, et al. Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). New Orleans, LA: Association for Computational Linguis- tics; 2018: 2227-2237. https://aclanthology.org/N18-1202.
  9. Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
  10. Yao Z, Cao L, Pan H. Zero-shot entity linking with efficient long range sequence modeling. In: Findings of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020; Association for Computa- tional Linguistics; 2020: 2517-22; Online.
  11. Guo C, Pleiss G, Sun Y, Weinberger KQ. On calibration of modern neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learn- ing. PMLR; 2017: 1321-1330; Sydney, Australia.
  12. Frenkel L, Goldberger J. Network calibration by class-based tem- perature scaling. In: 2021 29th European Signal Processing Confer- ence (EUSIPCO). IEEE; 2021: 1486-1490; Dublin, IE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Z., Tsai, J., Liu, W., Levy, D. A., Druhl, E., Reisman, J. I., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research (US)
Corresponding author
Yu, Hong
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2023-05-02
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1429-1437
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W4377094629
Cited by
15
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01NR020868, R01MH125027)
  • National Center on Homelessness
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Homeless Programs Office
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
natural language processing, social determinants of health, housing insecurity, homelessness, veterans, prompt engineering, temperature scaling, class imbalance
MeSH terms
Ill-Housed Persons, Housing, Humans, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review