Cited by 29Innovations in Medical EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Medical student awareness of and interest in clinical informatics

Open access
Banerjee, Rahul, George, Paul, Priebe, Cedric, Alper, Eric·2015·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate medical students’ attitudes about Clinical Informatics (CI) training and careers. Materials and Methods We distributed a web-based survey to students at four US allopathic medical schools. Results Five hundred and fifty-seven medical students responded. Interest in CI training opportunities (medical school electives, residency electives, or academic fellowships) surpassed respondents’ prior awareness of these opportunities. Thirty percent of student respondents expressed at least some interest in a CI-related career, but they were no more aware of training opportunities than their peers who did not express such an interest. Discussion Almost one third of medical students who responded to our survey expressed an interest in a CI-related career, but they were generally unaware of CI training and mentoring opportunities available to them. Early outreach to such medical students, through elective classes, professional society incentives, or expert partnerships, may positively influence the size and skill set of the future CI workforce. Conclusion We should work as a field to increase the quantity, quality, and publicity of CI learning opportunities for interested medical students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocu046

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. AAMC. Medical Informatics and Population Health: Report II of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med. 1999; 74(2):130-141.
  2. McGowan JJ, Passiment M, Hoffman HM. Educating Medical Students as Competent Users of Health Information Technologies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129: 1414-1418.
  3. Briscoe GW, Arcand LGF, Lin T, et al. Students' and resi- dents' perceptions regrading technology in medical training. Acad Psych. 2006;30(6):470-479.
  4. Beaudoin DE, Richardson SJ, Sheng X, et al. Medical stu- dents' perspectives on biomedical informatics learning ob- jectives. Int J Med Ed. 2013;4:1-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, R., George, P., Priebe, C., & Alper, E.
Affiliations
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Lifespan (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2015-02-28
Volume
22
Issue
e1
Pages
e42-e47
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2104211679
Cited by
29
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Brown University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
clinical informatics, medical students, career interest, training opportunities, awareness, academic fellowships, workforce development, student outreach
MeSH terms
Attitude, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Fellowships and Scholarships, Medical Informatics, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review