Cited by 27Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Have you got the time? Challenges using vendor electronic health record metrics of provider efficiency

Open access
Hron, Jonathan D, Lourie, Eli·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

The rise of clinician burnout has been correlated with the increased adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). Some vendors have used data entry logs to measure the amount of time spent using the EHR and have developed metrics of provider efficiency. Initial attempts to utilize these data have proven difficult as it is not always apparent whether variations reflect provider behavior or simply the metric definitions. Metric definitions are also updated intermittently without warning, making longitudinal assessment problematic. Because the metrics are based on proprietary algorithms, they are impossible to validate without costly time-motion studies and are also difficult to compare across institutions and vendors. Clinical informaticians must partner with vendors in order to develop industry standards of EHR use, which could then be used to examine the impact of EHRs on clinician burnout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocz222

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hron, J. D., & Lourie, E.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Hron, Jonathan D
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2020-02-04
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
644-646
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W3006426907
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, clinician burnout, metric validation, metric standardization, EHR adoption, time and motion study
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Commerce, Efficiency, Humans, Efficiency, Organizational, Benchmarking, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review