Cited by 13Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Explaining Variability in Electronic Health Record Effort in Primary Care Ambulatory Encounters

Open access
Overhage, J. Marc, Qeadan, Fares, Choi, Eun Ho Eunice, Vos, Duncan, Kroth, Philip J.·2024·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

Background Electronic health record (EHR) user interface event logs are fast providing another perspective on the value and efficiency EHR technology brings to health care. Analysis of these detailed usage data has demonstrated their potential to identify EHR and clinical process design factors related to user efficiency, satisfaction, and burnout. Objective This study aimed to analyze the event log data across 26 different health systems to determine the variability of use of a single vendor's EHR based on four event log metrics, at the individual, practice group, and health system levels. Methods We obtained de-identified event log data recorded from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, from 26 health systems' primary care physicians. We estimated the variability in total Active EHR Time, Documentation Time, Chart Review Time, and Ordering Time across health systems, practice groups, and individual physicians. Results In total, 5,444 physicians (Family Medicine: 3,042 and Internal Medicine: 2,422) provided care in a total of 2,285 different practices nested in 26 health systems. Health systems explain 1.29, 3.55, 3.45, and 3.30% of the total variability in Active Time, Documentation Time, Chart Review Time, and Ordering Time, respectively. Practice-level variability was estimated to be 7.96, 13.52, 8.39, and 5.57%, respectively, and individual physicians explained the largest proportion of the variability for those same outcomes 17.09, 27.49, 17.51, and 19.75%, respectively. Conclusion The most variable physician EHR usage patterns occurs at the individual physician level and decreases as you move up to the practice and health system levels. This suggests that interventions to improve individual users' EHR usage efficiency may have the most potential impact compared with those directed at health system or practice levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0044-1782228

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Melnyk B. National academy of medicine's action collaborative on clinician well-being and resilience: a solution-focused strategy is designed to curtail the burnout epidemic. Am Nurse Today 2019; 14(04):61-64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overhage, J. M., Qeadan, F., Choi, E. H. E., Vos, D., & Kroth, P. J.
Affiliations
  • The Overhage Group, Zionsville, Indiana, United States
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Kroth, Philip J.
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2024-03
Volume
15
Issue
02
Pages
212-219
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394759276
Cited by
13
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, primary care, documentation time, inter-physician variability, general practice, internal medicine
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Documentation, Humans, Physicians, Primary Health Care, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review