The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Variability of AOAC Methods of Analysis as Used in Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry
Abstract
Pharmaceutical analytical chemistry, which ordinarily deals with the analysis of formulations containing from 0.1 to 100% of active ingredient, uses methods with a reproducibility (between-laboratory variability) of about 2.5% and a repeatability (within-laboratory variability) of about half that amount. The best between-laboratory precision attainable appears to be about 1.0% and within-laboratory precision, about 0.5%. On the basis of the results available, automated methods do not appear to be any more precise than manual methods, although the studies show fewer outlying data points. Replicates (preferably blind ones) should always be conducted in a collaborative interlaboratory study in order to obtain the important information as to whether efforts should be concentrated on improving the method itself or on the performance of laboratories and analysts in applying it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Relationships between energy balance and health traits of dairy cattle in early lactation
Collard, B. L., Boettcher, P. J., Dekkers, J. C. M., Petitclerc, D., & Schaeffer, L. R. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75162-9 · Cited by 370
Role of cell walls in the bioaccessibility of lipids in almond seeds
Ellis, P. R., Kendall, C. W., Ren, Y., Parker, C., Pacy, J. F., Waldron, K. W., & Jenkins, D. J. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.3.604 · Cited by 321
Beneficial Effect of a Low Glycaemic Index Diet in Type 2 Diabetes
Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, D. J. A., Vuksan, V., Jenkins, A. L., Buckley, G. C., Wong, G. S., & Josse, R. G. (1992) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01816.x · Cited by 195
Characteristics of antioxidant activity and composition of pumpkin seed oils in 12 cultivars
Nawirska-Olszańska, A., Kita, A., Biesiada, A., Sokół-Łętowska, A., & Kucharska, A. Z. (2013) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.009 · Cited by 184
Jiao, Z., Dong, Y., & Chen, Q. (2014) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12084 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Horwitz, W.
- Venue
- Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-11-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1355-1363
- ISSN
- 0004-5756 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W24488698
- Cited by
- 1,902
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Variability of AOAC Methods of Analysis as Used in Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jaoac/60.6.1355
- The paper
- Horwitz, W. (1977). The Variability of AOAC Methods of Analysis as Used in Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/60.6.1355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.