The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Assay for Protein Digestibility: Interlaboratory Study
Abstract
True protein digestibilities of 17 protein sources were estimated by 6 laboratories using an in vitro, 3-enzyme digestion system in a pH stat. Samples from animal, vegetable, and mixed food sources were freeze-dried (if not already dried), ground, mixed, and shipped to each collaborator along with a sodium caseinate standard and trypsin, chymotrypsin, and peptidase. The uptake of titrant during enzymatic digestion was used to calculate estimates of digestibility. Digestibilities ranged from 100% for casein to 89.9% for whole wheat cereal. Mean relative standard deviations for repeatability were 1.4% for rolled oats and less than 1% for the remaining 16 samples. Mean relative standard deviations for reproducibility ranged from 5.0 to 0.8%; values were less than 2.5% for 13 of the 17 samples.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various workers have reported good correlations between some of the in vitro methods proposed and in vivo digestibility.
“Various workers have reported good correlations between some of the in vitro methods proposed and in vivo digestibility (30,59 -62) .”
From Protein quality evaluation twenty years after the introduction of the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score method (2012) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boye, J., Wijesinha-Bettoni, R., & Burlingame, B. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512002309 · Cited by 421
EI, S. N., & Kavas, A. (1996) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0308-8146(95)00111-5 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcdonough, F. E., Sarwar, G., Steinke, F. H., Slump, P., Garcia, S., & Boisen, S.
- Affiliations
- Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center (US)
- Health Canada (CA)
- Protein Technologies International, St. Louis, MO 63164
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- Kraft Heinz (United States) (US)
- National Institute of Animal Science, Foulum Research Center, Postbox 39, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
- ORCID
- Sarwar, Ghulam
- Venue
- Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 622-625
- ISSN
- 0004-5756 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4115918
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- protein digestibility, in vitro digestion, interlaboratory comparison, enzymatic digestion, pH-stat, trypsin, chymotrypsin, proteolytic enzymes, sodium caseinate, repeatability, reproducibility, rolled oats, animal protein sources, vegetable protein sources
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Caseins, Chymotrypsin, Dietary Proteins, Egg Proteins, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Meat, Nitrogen, Peptide Hydrolases, Trypsin, Vegetables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review